Seek Returns logo

HL vs. KGC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HL and KGC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHLKGC
Company NameHecla Mining CompanyKinross Gold Corporation
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningMetals & Mining
Market Capitalization8.94 billion USD30.85 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 17, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HL and KGC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HL vs. KGC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHLKGC
5-Day Price Return10.61%-0.68%
13-Week Price Return131.20%60.43%
26-Week Price Return149.35%91.88%
52-Week Price Return106.82%176.97%
Month-to-Date Return10.25%2.00%
Year-to-Date Return171.69%163.90%
10-Day Avg. Volume20.66M4.42M
3-Month Avg. Volume24.73M4.00M
3-Month Volatility62.60%39.33%
Beta1.381.13

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HL

4.74%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.55%
Q3
17.74%
Median
9.00%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-21.32%

HL’s Return on Equity of 4.74% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KGC

14.61%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.55%
Q3
17.74%
Median
9.00%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-21.32%

KGC’s Return on Equity of 14.61% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HL vs. KGC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HL

9.46%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
43.69%
Q3
19.12%
Median
6.48%
Q1
1.50%
Min
-20.21%

HL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.46% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KGC

25.18%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
43.69%
Q3
19.12%
Median
6.48%
Q1
1.50%
Min
-20.21%

A Net Profit Margin of 25.18% places KGC in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HL vs. KGC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HL

19.50%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
71.84%
Q3
32.31%
Median
12.50%
Q1
2.69%
Min
-23.81%

HL’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.50% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KGC

39.42%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
71.84%
Q3
32.31%
Median
12.50%
Q1
2.69%
Min
-23.81%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.42% places KGC in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

HL vs. KGC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHLKGC
Return on Equity (TTM)4.74%14.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.27%8.86%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.46%25.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.50%39.42%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.29%44.10%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HL

2.67

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.04
Median
1.96
Q1
1.42
Min
0.13

HL’s Current Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KGC

2.01

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.04
Median
1.96
Q1
1.42
Min
0.13

KGC’s Current Ratio of 2.01 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HL vs. KGC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HL

0.24

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.51
Median
0.33
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

HL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.24 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KGC

0.21

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.51
Median
0.33
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

KGC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HL vs. KGC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HL

2.47

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
22.73
Median
5.76
Q1
0.82
Min
-21.72

HL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.47 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KGC

46.86

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
22.73
Median
5.76
Q1
0.82
Min
-21.72

KGC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 46.86 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

HL vs. KGC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHLKGC
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.672.01
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.990.79
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.240.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.4746.86

Growth

Revenue Growth

HL vs. KGC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HL vs. KGC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HL

0.26%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.25%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HL’s Dividend Yield of 0.26% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KGC

0.48%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.25%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KGC’s Dividend Yield of 0.48% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HL vs. KGC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HL

22.30%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
62.06%
Median
33.17%
Q1
10.41%
Min
0.00%

HL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.30% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KGC

9.64%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
62.06%
Median
33.17%
Q1
10.41%
Min
0.00%

KGC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.64% is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

HL vs. KGC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHLKGC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.26%0.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.30%9.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HL

85.83

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
83.04
Q3
41.69
Median
20.30
Q1
12.95
Min
1.75

At 85.83, HL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

KGC

20.12

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
83.04
Q3
41.69
Median
20.30
Q1
12.95
Min
1.75

KGC’s P/E Ratio of 20.12 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HL vs. KGC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HL

8.12

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
4.28
Median
2.37
Q1
0.86
Min
0.16

HL’s P/S Ratio of 8.12 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

KGC

5.07

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
4.28
Median
2.37
Q1
0.86
Min
0.16

KGC’s P/S Ratio of 5.07 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HL vs. KGC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HL

1.64

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.45
Median
1.55
Q1
0.94
Min
0.34

HL’s P/B Ratio of 1.64 is within the conventional range for the Metals & Mining industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KGC

1.72

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.45
Median
1.55
Q1
0.94
Min
0.34

KGC’s P/B Ratio of 1.72 is within the conventional range for the Metals & Mining industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HL vs. KGC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHLKGC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)85.8320.12
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.125.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.641.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)77.9215.51