Seek Returns logo

HIMS vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HIMS and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHIMSUBER
Company NameHims & Hers Health, Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareIndustrials
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization9.72 billion USD198.45 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 13, 2019May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HIMS and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HIMS vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHIMSUBER
5-Day Price Return1.92%-0.17%
13-Week Price Return-19.67%8.14%
26-Week Price Return-37.46%17.25%
52-Week Price Return161.18%29.80%
Month-to-Date Return-35.04%8.44%
Year-to-Date Return77.79%57.76%
10-Day Avg. Volume23.34M15.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume42.20M20.51M
3-Month Volatility102.58%29.36%
Beta2.261.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HIMS

38.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

HIMS’s Return on Equity of 38.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HIMS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

9.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.62% places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HIMS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

6.24%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

HIMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.24% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HIMS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHIMSUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)38.17%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.98%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.62%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.24%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)76.20%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

4.98

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

HIMS’s Current Ratio of 4.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HIMS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

1.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

HIMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.72. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HIMS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

Interest Coverage Ratio data for HIMS is currently unavailable.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HIMS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHIMSUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.981.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.300.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.720.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)---0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

HIMS vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HIMS vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HIMS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HIMS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHIMSUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

50.64

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 50.64 places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HIMS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

4.87

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 4.87, HIMS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HIMS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

19.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

At 19.83, HIMS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HIMS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHIMSUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)50.6415.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.874.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.838.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.4622.90