Seek Returns logo

HIMS vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HIMS and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHIMSTTWO
Company NameHims & Hers Health, Inc.Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareCommunication Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesEntertainment
Market Capitalization11.88 billion USD47.53 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 13, 2019April 15, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HIMS and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HIMS vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHIMSTTWO
5-Day Price Return-11.13%-0.88%
13-Week Price Return9.50%7.32%
26-Week Price Return77.80%24.33%
52-Week Price Return177.26%70.23%
Month-to-Date Return-7.37%-0.26%
Year-to-Date Return117.29%39.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume24.73M1.93M
3-Month Avg. Volume35.30M1.85M
3-Month Volatility79.71%24.28%
Beta2.470.96

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HIMS

38.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

HIMS’s Return on Equity of 38.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TTWO

-98.81%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -98.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

HIMS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

9.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.62% places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TTWO

-72.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -72.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

HIMS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

6.24%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

HIMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.24% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-72.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

HIMS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHIMSTTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)38.17%-98.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.98%-37.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.62%-72.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.24%-72.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)76.20%56.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

4.98

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

HIMS’s Current Ratio of 4.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TTWO

1.16

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HIMS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

1.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

HIMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.72. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TTWO

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

HIMS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

Interest Coverage Ratio data for HIMS is currently unavailable.

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HIMS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHIMSTTWO
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.981.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.301.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.720.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)---44.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

HIMS vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HIMS vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HIMS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HIMS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHIMSTTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

61.34

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

At 61.34, HIMS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TTWO

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

HIMS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

5.90

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 5.90, HIMS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TTWO

8.15

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 8.15 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HIMS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

19.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

At 19.83, HIMS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TTWO

12.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 12.74 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HIMS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHIMSTTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)61.34--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.908.15
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.8312.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)50.21210.26