Seek Returns logo

HIMS vs. TSLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HIMS and TSLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHIMSTSLA
Company NameHims & Hers Health, Inc.Tesla, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesAutomobiles
Market Capitalization9.80 billion USD1,044.72 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 13, 2019June 29, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HIMS and TSLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HIMS vs. TSLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHIMSTSLA
5-Day Price Return-7.96%-3.48%
13-Week Price Return-30.41%-5.32%
26-Week Price Return-26.70%-9.00%
52-Week Price Return161.96%45.43%
Month-to-Date Return-34.45%5.07%
Year-to-Date Return79.40%-19.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume24.23M77.14M
3-Month Avg. Volume41.88M104.32M
3-Month Volatility102.99%55.64%
Beta2.282.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HIMS

38.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

HIMS’s Return on Equity of 38.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TSLA

8.22%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

TSLA’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HIMS vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

9.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.62% places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TSLA

6.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.54% places TSLA in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HIMS vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

6.24%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

HIMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.24% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TSLA

6.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

TSLA’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.06% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HIMS vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHIMSTSLA
Return on Equity (TTM)38.17%8.22%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.98%4.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.62%6.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.24%6.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)76.20%17.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

4.98

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

HIMS’s Current Ratio of 4.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TSLA

2.04

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

TSLA’s Current Ratio of 2.04 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

HIMS vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

1.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

HIMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.72. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TSLA

0.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, TSLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HIMS vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

Interest Coverage Ratio data for HIMS is currently unavailable.

TSLA

71.48

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

TSLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 71.48 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

HIMS vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHIMSTSLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.982.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.301.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.720.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--71.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

HIMS vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HIMS vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HIMS vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HIMS vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHIMSTSLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

50.64

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 50.64 places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TSLA

172.34

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

At 172.34, TSLA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HIMS vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

4.87

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 4.87, HIMS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TSLA

11.27

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 11.27, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HIMS vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

19.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

At 19.83, HIMS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TSLA

13.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 13.23, TSLA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HIMS vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHIMSTSLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)50.64172.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.8711.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.8313.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.46187.03