Seek Returns logo

HIMS vs. SPOT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HIMS and SPOT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHIMSSPOT
Company NameHims & Hers Health, Inc.Spotify Technology S.A.
CountryUnited StatesLuxembourg
GICS SectorHealth CareCommunication Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesEntertainment
Market Capitalization9.95 billion USD142.60 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 13, 2019April 3, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HIMS and SPOT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HIMS vs. SPOT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHIMSSPOT
5-Day Price Return0.11%0.51%
13-Week Price Return-17.52%6.06%
26-Week Price Return-10.69%14.10%
52-Week Price Return174.21%106.20%
Month-to-Date Return-33.50%10.61%
Year-to-Date Return82.01%54.90%
10-Day Avg. Volume23.34M1.55M
3-Month Avg. Volume42.31M2.18M
3-Month Volatility102.11%44.13%
Beta2.241.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HIMS

38.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

HIMS’s Return on Equity of 38.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SPOT

14.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

SPOT’s Return on Equity of 14.00% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HIMS vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

9.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.62% places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SPOT

4.85%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, SPOT’s Net Profit Margin of 4.85% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

HIMS vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

6.24%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

HIMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.24% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SPOT

11.11%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

SPOT’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.11% is around the midpoint for the Entertainment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HIMS vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHIMSSPOT
Return on Equity (TTM)38.17%14.00%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.98%6.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.62%4.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.24%11.11%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)76.20%31.63%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

4.98

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

HIMS’s Current Ratio of 4.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SPOT

1.47

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

SPOT’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HIMS vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

1.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

HIMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.72. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SPOT

0.36

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

SPOT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HIMS vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

Interest Coverage Ratio data for HIMS is currently unavailable.

SPOT

38.25

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

SPOT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.25 is in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

HIMS vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHIMSSPOT
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.981.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.301.46
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.720.36
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--38.25

Growth

Revenue Growth

HIMS vs. SPOT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HIMS vs. SPOT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SPOT

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SPOT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HIMS vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SPOT

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SPOT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HIMS vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHIMSSPOT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

50.64

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 50.64 places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SPOT

151.28

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

At 151.28, SPOT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Entertainment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HIMS vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

4.87

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 4.87, HIMS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SPOT

7.34

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

SPOT’s P/S Ratio of 7.34 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HIMS vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

19.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

At 19.83, HIMS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SPOT

20.34

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

At 20.34, SPOT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HIMS vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHIMSSPOT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)50.64151.28
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.877.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.8320.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.4643.24