Seek Returns logo

HIMS vs. NWL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HIMS and NWL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHIMSNWL
Company NameHims & Hers Health, Inc.Newell Brands Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization9.95 billion USD2.49 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 13, 2019March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HIMS and NWL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HIMS vs. NWL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHIMSNWL
5-Day Price Return0.11%8.38%
13-Week Price Return-17.52%8.97%
26-Week Price Return-10.69%-12.50%
52-Week Price Return174.21%-17.93%
Month-to-Date Return-33.50%6.06%
Year-to-Date Return82.01%-40.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume23.34M7.42M
3-Month Avg. Volume42.31M9.05M
3-Month Volatility102.11%62.46%
Beta2.241.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HIMS

38.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

HIMS’s Return on Equity of 38.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

NWL

-8.84%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

NWL has a negative Return on Equity of -8.84%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

HIMS vs. NWL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

9.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.62% places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NWL

-3.29%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

NWL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3.29%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

HIMS vs. NWL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

6.24%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

HIMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.24% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NWL

0.70%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

NWL’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.70% is in the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

HIMS vs. NWL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHIMSNWL
Return on Equity (TTM)38.17%-8.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.98%-2.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.62%-3.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.24%0.70%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)76.20%34.58%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

4.98

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

HIMS’s Current Ratio of 4.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

NWL

1.12

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

NWL’s Current Ratio of 1.12 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HIMS vs. NWL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

1.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

HIMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.72. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NWL

1.89

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.89, NWL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Durables industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

HIMS vs. NWL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

Interest Coverage Ratio data for HIMS is currently unavailable.

NWL

0.14

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

NWL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.14 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

HIMS vs. NWL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHIMSNWL
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.981.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.300.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.721.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--0.14

Growth

Revenue Growth

HIMS vs. NWL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HIMS vs. NWL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NWL

5.03%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.03%, NWL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Household Durables industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

HIMS vs. NWL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NWL

63.04%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

NWL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.04% is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

HIMS vs. NWL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHIMSNWL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%5.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%63.04%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

50.64

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 50.64 places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

NWL

--

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

P/E Ratio data for NWL is currently unavailable.

HIMS vs. NWL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

4.87

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 4.87, HIMS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NWL

0.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

In the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, NWL’s P/S Ratio of 0.32 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

HIMS vs. NWL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

19.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

At 19.83, HIMS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NWL

0.84

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

NWL’s P/B Ratio of 0.84 is in the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

HIMS vs. NWL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHIMSNWL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)50.64--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.870.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.830.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.468.23