Seek Returns logo

HIMS vs. MNST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HIMS and MNST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHIMSMNST
Company NameHims & Hers Health, Inc.Monster Beverage Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesBeverages
Market Capitalization13.15 billion USD67.11 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 13, 2019December 9, 1985
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HIMS and MNST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HIMS vs. MNST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHIMSMNST
5-Day Price Return0.52%1.70%
13-Week Price Return13.52%15.38%
26-Week Price Return107.82%15.22%
52-Week Price Return199.23%39.58%
Month-to-Date Return2.56%2.11%
Year-to-Date Return140.57%30.76%
10-Day Avg. Volume27.56M4.75M
3-Month Avg. Volume35.47M5.71M
3-Month Volatility80.79%23.95%
Beta2.460.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HIMS

38.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

HIMS’s Return on Equity of 38.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MNST

24.73%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

In the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, MNST’s Return on Equity of 24.73% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

HIMS vs. MNST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

9.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.62% places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MNST

20.54%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.54% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HIMS vs. MNST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

6.24%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

HIMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.24% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MNST

26.93%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.93% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

HIMS vs. MNST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHIMSMNST
Return on Equity (TTM)38.17%24.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.98%19.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.62%20.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.24%26.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)76.20%55.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

4.98

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

HIMS’s Current Ratio of 4.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MNST

3.52

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

MNST’s Current Ratio of 3.52 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

HIMS vs. MNST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

1.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

HIMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.72. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MNST

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, MNST’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HIMS vs. MNST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

Interest Coverage Ratio data for HIMS is currently unavailable.

MNST

123.81

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 123.81, MNST demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Beverages industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

HIMS vs. MNST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHIMSMNST
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.983.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.302.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.720.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--123.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

HIMS vs. MNST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HIMS vs. MNST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

MNST currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HIMS vs. MNST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

MNST has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HIMS vs. MNST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHIMSMNST
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

67.91

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

At 67.91, HIMS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MNST

42.36

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

At 42.36, MNST’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Beverages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HIMS vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

6.53

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 6.53, HIMS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MNST

8.70

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

With a P/S Ratio of 8.70, MNST trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HIMS vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

19.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

At 19.83, HIMS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MNST

8.49

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

At 8.49, MNST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HIMS vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHIMSMNST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)67.9142.36
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.538.70
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.838.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)55.5935.93