Seek Returns logo

HIMS vs. MDLZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HIMS and MDLZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHIMSMDLZ
Company NameHims & Hers Health, Inc.Mondelez International, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesFood Products
Market Capitalization10.92 billion USD80.47 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 13, 2019June 13, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HIMS and MDLZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HIMS vs. MDLZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHIMSMDLZ
5-Day Price Return-5.33%-0.34%
13-Week Price Return-12.46%-5.53%
26-Week Price Return19.42%7.54%
52-Week Price Return202.63%-10.23%
Month-to-Date Return-26.97%-3.86%
Year-to-Date Return99.88%4.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume38.61M8.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume42.15M7.87M
3-Month Volatility110.00%22.56%
Beta2.250.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HIMS

38.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

HIMS’s Return on Equity of 38.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MDLZ

13.64%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

MDLZ’s Return on Equity of 13.64% is on par with the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HIMS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

9.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.62% places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MDLZ

9.81%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

MDLZ’s Net Profit Margin of 9.81% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Food Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HIMS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

6.24%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

HIMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.24% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MDLZ

12.44%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

MDLZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.44% is around the midpoint for the Food Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HIMS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHIMSMDLZ
Return on Equity (TTM)38.17%13.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.98%5.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.62%9.81%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.24%12.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)76.20%32.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

4.98

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

HIMS’s Current Ratio of 4.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MDLZ

0.64

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

MDLZ’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HIMS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

1.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

HIMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.72. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MDLZ

0.80

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

MDLZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80 is typical for the Food Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HIMS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

Interest Coverage Ratio data for HIMS is currently unavailable.

MDLZ

13.32

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

MDLZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.32 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HIMS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHIMSMDLZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.980.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.300.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.720.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--13.32

Growth

Revenue Growth

HIMS vs. MDLZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HIMS vs. MDLZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MDLZ

3.06%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

MDLZ’s Dividend Yield of 3.06% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HIMS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MDLZ

66.77%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

MDLZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 66.77% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HIMS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHIMSMDLZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.06%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%66.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

56.42

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

At 56.42, HIMS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MDLZ

21.82

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

MDLZ’s P/E Ratio of 21.82 is within the middle range for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HIMS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

5.43

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 5.43, HIMS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MDLZ

2.14

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

MDLZ’s P/S Ratio of 2.14 is in the upper echelon for the Food Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HIMS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

19.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

At 19.83, HIMS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MDLZ

3.33

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

MDLZ’s P/B Ratio of 3.33 is in the upper tier for the Food Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HIMS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHIMSMDLZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)56.4221.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.432.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.833.33
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)46.1927.77