HBAN vs. MTB: Huntington Bancshares vs. M&T Bank Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) and M&T Bank (MTB) are both classified in the Regional Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) is heavily traded at around 24.74M shares per day, whereas M&T Bank (MTB) sees a more moderate 979.16K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

M&T Bank (MTB) at 10.60% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) at 9.19% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

M&T Bank (MTB) at 31.87% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) at 25.37% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) in Banks and M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) at 10.22% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while M&T Bank (MTB) at 4.34% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) at 13.93% and M&T Bank (MTB) at 16.12% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) in Banks and M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) in Banks and M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) at 3.97% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while M&T Bank (MTB) at 2.73% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, HBAN the richer one.

M&T Bank (MTB) at 31.35% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) at 50.82% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) at 12.68 and M&T Bank (MTB) at 11.38 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) in Banks and M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) at 1.06 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while M&T Bank (MTB) at 1.24 is valued near its industry’s middle — HBAN is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics