Seek Returns logo

HAS vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HAS and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

HAS is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolHASVIPS
Company NameHasbro, Inc.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryLeisure ProductsBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization10.60 billion USD9.09 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HAS and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HAS vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHASVIPS
5-Day Price Return0.82%6.33%
13-Week Price Return2.75%30.50%
26-Week Price Return23.35%20.27%
52-Week Price Return5.20%24.54%
Month-to-Date Return-6.55%17.32%
Year-to-Date Return35.66%45.81%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.64M3.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.99M2.85M
3-Month Volatility22.48%27.32%
Beta0.620.85

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.33%
Q3
18.49%
Median
14.83%
Q1
2.57%
Min
-8.74%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

VIPS

17.61%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 17.61% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HAS vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
10.59%
Q3
10.12%
Median
7.76%
Q1
1.39%
Min
-4.77%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

VIPS

6.53%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HAS vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
14.69%
Q3
14.18%
Median
12.19%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-8.06%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

VIPS

7.65%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.65% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

HAS vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHASVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)-58.96%17.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)-9.17%9.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-13.37%6.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-8.06%7.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.02%23.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.58
Q3
3.41
Median
2.38
Q1
1.76
Min
1.04

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VIPS

1.26

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HAS vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
1.10
Median
0.25
Q1
0.07
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

VIPS

0.17

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HAS vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max
47.39
Q3
30.53
Median
16.20
Q1
5.29
Min
-0.46

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

HAS vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHASVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.661.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.141.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)13.770.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.34150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

HAS vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HAS vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HAS

3.72%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
3.53%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.72%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HAS vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
93.27%
Median
76.96%
Q1
47.15%
Min
0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HAS vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHASVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.72%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)63.63%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HAS

--

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.88
Q3
36.36
Median
24.51
Q1
18.86
Min
9.55

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

VIPS

9.96

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 9.96 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

HAS vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HAS

2.48

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
2.49
Median
1.68
Q1
1.11
Min
0.48

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.48 aligns with the market consensus for the Leisure Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VIPS

0.65

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.65 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

HAS vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max
5.29
Q3
4.74
Median
3.12
Q1
2.19
Min
1.17

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VIPS

1.40

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

HAS vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHASVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--9.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.480.65
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)42.901.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.05--