Seek Returns logo

HAS vs. SE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HAS and SE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

HAS is a standard domestic listing, while SE trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolHASSE
Company NameHasbro, Inc.Sea Limited
CountryUnited StatesSingapore
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryCommunication Services
GICS IndustryLeisure ProductsEntertainment
Market Capitalization11.44 billion USD110.44 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980October 20, 2017
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HAS and SE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HAS vs. SE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHASSE
5-Day Price Return0.14%-0.54%
13-Week Price Return21.51%15.71%
26-Week Price Return18.41%50.53%
52-Week Price Return19.86%129.62%
Month-to-Date Return8.00%19.08%
Year-to-Date Return45.18%75.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.24M3.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.21M4.39M
3-Month Volatility23.07%50.92%
Beta0.631.56

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
35.76%
Q3
21.83%
Median
14.83%
Q1
5.19%
Min
-14.10%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SE

13.69%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

SE’s Return on Equity of 13.69% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HAS vs. SE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
13.45%
Q3
10.46%
Median
9.86%
Q1
4.71%
Min
-0.81%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SE

6.17%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

SE’s Net Profit Margin of 6.17% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HAS vs. SE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
15.65%
Q3
14.39%
Median
12.60%
Q1
8.85%
Min
2.80%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SE

7.63%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

SE’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.63% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

HAS vs. SE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHASSE
Return on Equity (TTM)-58.96%13.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)-9.17%5.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-13.37%6.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-8.06%7.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.02%44.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
3.37
Median
2.25
Q1
1.67
Min
1.12

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SE

1.55

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

SE’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HAS vs. SE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.68
Q3
1.13
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SE

0.65

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

SE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HAS vs. SE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.53
Q3
28.24
Median
14.76
Q1
5.23
Min
-6.13

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SE

-6.05

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

SE has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HAS vs. SE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHASSE
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.661.55
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.141.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)13.770.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.34-6.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

HAS vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HAS vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HAS

3.50%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.67%
Median
1.92%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.50%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HAS vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
85.97%
Median
68.01%
Q1
48.42%
Min
0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HAS vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHASSE
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.50%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)63.63%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HAS

--

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.62
Q3
29.98
Median
25.12
Q1
17.43
Min
10.66

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

SE

88.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

At 88.79, SE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Entertainment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HAS vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HAS

2.63

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.93
Median
1.67
Q1
1.14
Min
0.43

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the market consensus for the Leisure Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SE

5.48

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

SE’s P/S Ratio of 5.48 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HAS vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max
7.37
Q3
4.91
Median
3.05
Q1
1.94
Min
1.37

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SE

9.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

SE’s P/B Ratio of 9.79 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HAS vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHASSE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--88.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.635.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)42.909.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.3832.38