Seek Returns logo

HAS vs. RACE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HAS and RACE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHASRACE
Company NameHasbro, Inc.Ferrari N.V.
CountryUnited StatesItaly
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryLeisure ProductsAutomobiles
Market Capitalization10.60 billion USD87.73 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980October 21, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HAS and RACE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HAS vs. RACE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHASRACE
5-Day Price Return0.53%2.09%
13-Week Price Return-1.45%1.20%
26-Week Price Return37.42%4.61%
52-Week Price Return4.25%2.59%
Month-to-Date Return-0.37%2.09%
Year-to-Date Return35.16%1.89%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.77M0.31M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.01M0.31M
3-Month Volatility20.70%31.24%
Beta0.560.32

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.33%
Q3
18.49%
Median
14.83%
Q1
2.57%
Min
-8.74%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

RACE

45.61%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

RACE’s Return on Equity of 45.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HAS vs. RACE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
10.59%
Q3
10.12%
Median
7.76%
Q1
1.39%
Min
-4.77%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

RACE

22.91%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

RACE’s Net Profit Margin of 22.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

HAS vs. RACE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
14.69%
Q3
14.18%
Median
12.19%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-8.06%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

RACE

29.16%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

RACE’s Operating Profit Margin of 29.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

HAS vs. RACE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHASRACE
Return on Equity (TTM)-58.96%45.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)-9.17%16.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-13.37%22.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-8.06%29.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.02%51.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.58
Q3
3.41
Median
2.38
Q1
1.76
Min
1.04

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RACE

2.08

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

RACE’s Current Ratio of 2.08 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

HAS vs. RACE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
1.10
Median
0.25
Q1
0.07
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

RACE

0.89

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

RACE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HAS vs. RACE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max
47.39
Q3
30.53
Median
16.20
Q1
5.29
Min
-0.46

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RACE

181.49

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 181.49, RACE demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

HAS vs. RACE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHASRACE
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.662.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.141.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)13.770.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.34181.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

HAS vs. RACE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HAS vs. RACE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HAS

3.68%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
3.53%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.68%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

RACE

0.65%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RACE’s Dividend Yield of 0.65% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HAS vs. RACE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
93.27%
Median
76.96%
Q1
47.15%
Min
0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RACE

44.33%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

RACE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.33% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HAS vs. RACE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHASRACE
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.68%0.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)63.63%44.33%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HAS

--

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.88
Q3
36.36
Median
24.51
Q1
18.86
Min
9.55

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

RACE

50.90

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

At 50.90, RACE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HAS vs. RACE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HAS

2.50

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
2.49
Median
1.68
Q1
1.11
Min
0.48

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.50 is in the upper echelon for the Leisure Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RACE

11.66

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 11.66, RACE trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HAS vs. RACE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max
5.29
Q3
4.74
Median
3.12
Q1
2.19
Min
1.17

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RACE

22.78

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

At 22.78, RACE’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HAS vs. RACE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHASRACE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--50.90
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.5011.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)42.9022.78
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.2459.71