HAS vs. PKG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 13, 2025

Here’s a clear look at HAS and PKG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	HAS	PKG
Company Name	Hasbro, Inc.	Packaging Corporation of America
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Materials
GICS Industry	Leisure Products	Containers & Packaging
Market Capitalization	10.60 billion USD	19.19 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	January 28, 2000
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HAS and PKG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HAS vs. PKG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	HAS	PKG
5-Day Price Return	0.53%	-1.09%
13-Week Price Return	-1.45%	4.51%
26-Week Price Return	37.42%	12.75%
52-Week Price Return	4.25%	-0.03%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.37%	-2.13%
Year-to-Date Return	35.16%	-5.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.77M	0.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.01M	0.71M
3-Month Volatility	20.70%	22.53%
Beta	0.56	0.94

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max: 30.33%
Q3: 18.49%
Median: 14.83%
Q1: 2.57%
Min: -8.74%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PKG

20.33%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 36.99%
Q3: 19.86%
Median: 10.47%
Q1: 6.76%
Min: -0.20%

In the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, PKG’s Return on Equity of 20.33% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

HAS vs. PKG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max: 10.59%
Q3: 10.12%
Median: 7.76%
Q1: 1.39%
Min: -4.77%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

PKG

10.47%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 10.84%
Q3: 8.25%
Median: 4.91%
Q1: 3.65%
Min: -0.12%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.47% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HAS vs. PKG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max: 14.69%
Q3: 14.18%
Median: 12.19%
Q1: 4.57%
Min: -8.06%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

PKG

14.39%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 22.03%
Q3: 13.09%
Median: 8.06%
Q1: 6.46%
Min: -0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.39% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

HAS vs. PKG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	HAS	PKG
Return on Equity (TTM)	-58.96%	20.33%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-9.17%	10.16%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-13.37%	10.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	-8.06%	14.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	65.02%	22.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max: 3.58
Q3: 3.41
Median: 2.38
Q1: 1.76
Min: 1.04

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PKG

3.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 1.96
Q3: 1.45
Median: 1.33
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.87

PKG’s Current Ratio of 3.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

HAS vs. PKG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max: 1.54
Q3: 1.10
Median: 0.25
Q1: 0.07
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PKG

0.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.15
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.20
Q1: 0.53
Min: 0.23

PKG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HAS vs. PKG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max: 47.39
Q3: 30.53
Median: 16.20
Q1: 5.29
Min: -0.46

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PKG

26.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 13.16
Q3: 8.10
Median: 3.38
Q1: 2.83
Min: 1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.71, PKG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

HAS vs. PKG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	HAS	PKG
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.66	3.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.14	2.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	13.77	0.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	5.34	26.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

HAS vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HAS vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HAS

3.68%

Leisure Products Industry

Max: 5.44%
Q3: 3.53%
Median: 1.89%
Q1: 1.26%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.68%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PKG

2.37%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 7.14%
Q3: 4.65%
Median: 3.69%
Q1: 2.00%
Min: 0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Yield of 2.37% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HAS vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max: 133.30%
Q3: 93.27%
Median: 76.96%
Q1: 47.15%
Min: 0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PKG

49.67%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 222.75%
Q3: 132.16%
Median: 65.79%
Q1: 28.53%
Min: 0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.67% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HAS vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	HAS	PKG
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.68%	2.37%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	63.63%	49.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HAS

Leisure Products Industry

Max: 39.88
Q3: 36.36
Median: 24.51
Q1: 18.86
Min: 9.55

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

PKG

20.95

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 24.22
Q3: 20.28
Median: 17.07
Q1: 15.06
Min: 7.79

A P/E Ratio of 20.95 places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

HAS vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HAS

2.50

Leisure Products Industry

Max: 3.09
Q3: 2.49
Median: 1.68
Q1: 1.11
Min: 0.48

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.50 is in the upper echelon for the Leisure Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PKG

2.19

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 1.99
Q3: 1.17
Median: 0.94
Q1: 0.55
Min: 0.31

With a P/S Ratio of 2.19, PKG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Containers & Packaging industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HAS vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max: 5.29
Q3: 4.74
Median: 3.12
Q1: 2.19
Min: 1.17

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PKG

3.66

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.79
Q3: 3.32
Median: 2.14
Q1: 1.60
Min: 0.89

PKG’s P/B Ratio of 3.66 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HAS vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	HAS	PKG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	20.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.50	2.19
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	42.90	3.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	21.24	30.40