Seek Returns logo

HAS vs. MCD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HAS and MCD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHASMCD
Company NameHasbro, Inc.McDonald's Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryLeisure ProductsHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization10.60 billion USD217.82 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980July 5, 1966
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HAS and MCD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HAS vs. MCD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHASMCD
5-Day Price Return0.82%-0.14%
13-Week Price Return2.75%4.01%
26-Week Price Return23.35%-3.09%
52-Week Price Return5.20%0.07%
Month-to-Date Return-6.55%-3.08%
Year-to-Date Return35.66%4.83%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.64M3.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.99M3.47M
3-Month Volatility22.48%14.18%
Beta0.620.50

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.33%
Q3
18.49%
Median
14.83%
Q1
2.57%
Min
-8.74%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MCD

95.13%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

MCD’s Return on Equity of 95.13% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HAS vs. MCD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
10.59%
Q3
10.12%
Median
7.76%
Q1
1.39%
Min
-4.77%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MCD

32.21%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

MCD’s Net Profit Margin of 32.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

HAS vs. MCD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
14.69%
Q3
14.18%
Median
12.19%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-8.06%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MCD

45.80%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

An Operating Profit Margin of 45.80% places MCD in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

HAS vs. MCD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHASMCD
Return on Equity (TTM)-58.96%95.13%
Return on Assets (TTM)-9.17%14.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-13.37%32.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-8.06%45.80%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.02%57.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.58
Q3
3.41
Median
2.38
Q1
1.76
Min
1.04

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MCD

1.30

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

MCD’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HAS vs. MCD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
1.10
Median
0.25
Q1
0.07
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MCD

40.64

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 40.64, MCD operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

HAS vs. MCD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max
47.39
Q3
30.53
Median
16.20
Q1
5.29
Min
-0.46

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MCD

9.26

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

MCD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HAS vs. MCD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHASMCD
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.661.30
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.141.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)13.7740.64
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.349.26

Growth

Revenue Growth

HAS vs. MCD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HAS vs. MCD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HAS

3.72%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
3.53%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.72%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MCD

2.32%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCD’s Dividend Yield of 2.32% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HAS vs. MCD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
93.27%
Median
76.96%
Q1
47.15%
Min
0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MCD

59.51%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.51% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HAS vs. MCD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHASMCD
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.72%2.32%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)63.63%59.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HAS

--

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.88
Q3
36.36
Median
24.51
Q1
18.86
Min
9.55

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

MCD

25.70

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

MCD’s P/E Ratio of 25.70 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HAS vs. MCD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HAS

2.48

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
2.49
Median
1.68
Q1
1.11
Min
0.48

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.48 aligns with the market consensus for the Leisure Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MCD

8.28

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

With a P/S Ratio of 8.28, MCD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HAS vs. MCD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max
5.29
Q3
4.74
Median
3.12
Q1
2.19
Min
1.17

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MCD

160.46

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

At 160.46, MCD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HAS vs. MCD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHASMCD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--25.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.488.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)42.90160.46
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.0531.28