Seek Returns logo

HAS vs. MAT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HAS and MAT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHASMAT
Company NameHasbro, Inc.Mattel, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryLeisure ProductsLeisure Products
Market Capitalization11.18 billion USD5.70 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980June 17, 1976
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HAS and MAT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HAS vs. MAT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHASMAT
5-Day Price Return-1.07%-3.17%
13-Week Price Return16.88%-11.50%
26-Week Price Return32.27%-19.25%
52-Week Price Return20.14%-7.18%
Month-to-Date Return6.03%4.06%
Year-to-Date Return42.53%-0.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.88M3.62M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.25M4.16M
3-Month Volatility23.99%40.67%
Beta0.620.73

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
35.76%
Q3
21.83%
Median
14.83%
Q1
5.19%
Min
-14.10%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MAT

23.71%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
35.76%
Q3
21.83%
Median
14.83%
Q1
5.19%
Min
-14.10%

In the upper quartile for the Leisure Products industry, MAT’s Return on Equity of 23.71% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

HAS vs. MAT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Leisure Products industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
13.45%
Q3
10.46%
Median
9.86%
Q1
4.71%
Min
-0.81%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MAT

9.86%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
13.45%
Q3
10.46%
Median
9.86%
Q1
4.71%
Min
-0.81%

MAT’s Net Profit Margin of 9.86% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Leisure Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HAS vs. MAT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Leisure Products industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
15.65%
Q3
14.39%
Median
12.60%
Q1
8.85%
Min
2.80%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MAT

12.60%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
15.65%
Q3
14.39%
Median
12.60%
Q1
8.85%
Min
2.80%

MAT’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.60% is around the midpoint for the Leisure Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HAS vs. MAT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Leisure Products industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHASMAT
Return on Equity (TTM)-58.96%23.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)-9.17%8.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-13.37%9.86%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-8.06%12.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.02%51.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
3.37
Median
2.25
Q1
1.67
Min
1.12

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MAT

1.62

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
3.37
Median
2.25
Q1
1.67
Min
1.12

MAT’s Current Ratio of 1.62 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HAS vs. MAT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Leisure Products industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.68
Q3
1.13
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MAT

1.08

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.68
Q3
1.13
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

MAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08 is typical for the Leisure Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HAS vs. MAT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Leisure Products industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.53
Q3
28.24
Median
14.76
Q1
5.23
Min
-6.13

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MAT

11.00

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.53
Q3
28.24
Median
14.76
Q1
5.23
Min
-6.13

MAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HAS vs. MAT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Leisure Products industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHASMAT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.661.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.140.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)13.771.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.3411.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

HAS vs. MAT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HAS vs. MAT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HAS

3.50%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.67%
Median
1.92%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.50%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MAT

0.00%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.67%
Median
1.92%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

MAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HAS vs. MAT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Leisure Products industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
85.97%
Median
68.01%
Q1
48.42%
Min
0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MAT

0.00%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
85.97%
Median
68.01%
Q1
48.42%
Min
0.00%

MAT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HAS vs. MAT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Leisure Products industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHASMAT
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.50%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)63.63%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HAS

--

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.62
Q3
29.98
Median
25.12
Q1
17.43
Min
10.66

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

MAT

10.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.62
Q3
29.98
Median
25.12
Q1
17.43
Min
10.66

In the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry, MAT’s P/E Ratio of 10.77 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

HAS vs. MAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Leisure Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HAS

2.63

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.93
Median
1.67
Q1
1.14
Min
0.43

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the market consensus for the Leisure Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MAT

1.06

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.93
Median
1.67
Q1
1.14
Min
0.43

In the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry, MAT’s P/S Ratio of 1.06 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

HAS vs. MAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Leisure Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max
7.37
Q3
4.91
Median
3.05
Q1
1.94
Min
1.37

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MAT

2.93

Leisure Products Industry

Max
7.37
Q3
4.91
Median
3.05
Q1
1.94
Min
1.37

MAT’s P/B Ratio of 2.93 is within the conventional range for the Leisure Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HAS vs. MAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Leisure Products industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHASMAT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--10.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.631.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)42.902.93
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.386.40