Seek Returns logo

HAS vs. HLT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HAS and HLT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHASHLT
Company NameHasbro, Inc.Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryLeisure ProductsHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization11.44 billion USD65.01 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980December 12, 2013
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HAS and HLT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HAS vs. HLT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHASHLT
5-Day Price Return2.71%2.68%
13-Week Price Return21.04%9.21%
26-Week Price Return20.72%6.52%
52-Week Price Return19.05%28.39%
Month-to-Date Return8.52%3.10%
Year-to-Date Return45.88%11.83%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.37M1.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.23M1.89M
3-Month Volatility23.67%20.60%
Beta0.631.22

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
35.76%
Q3
21.83%
Median
14.83%
Q1
5.19%
Min
-14.10%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

HLT

171.01%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

HLT’s Return on Equity of 171.01% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HAS vs. HLT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
13.45%
Q3
10.46%
Median
9.86%
Q1
4.71%
Min
-0.81%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

HLT

13.84%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

HLT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.84% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HAS vs. HLT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
15.65%
Q3
14.39%
Median
12.60%
Q1
8.85%
Min
2.80%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

HLT

21.13%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

HLT’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.13% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HAS vs. HLT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHASHLT
Return on Equity (TTM)-58.96%171.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)-9.17%9.75%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-13.37%13.84%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-8.06%21.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.02%36.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
3.37
Median
2.25
Q1
1.67
Min
1.12

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HLT

0.54

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

HLT’s Current Ratio of 0.54 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HAS vs. HLT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.68
Q3
1.13
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

HLT

73.65

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 73.65, HLT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

HAS vs. HLT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.53
Q3
28.24
Median
14.76
Q1
5.23
Min
-6.13

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HLT

4.07

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

HLT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HAS vs. HLT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHASHLT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.660.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.140.49
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)13.7773.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.344.07

Growth

Revenue Growth

HAS vs. HLT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HAS vs. HLT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HAS

3.50%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.67%
Median
1.92%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.50%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

HLT

0.23%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HLT’s Dividend Yield of 0.23% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HAS vs. HLT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
85.97%
Median
68.01%
Q1
48.42%
Min
0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HLT

9.25%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HLT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.25% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HAS vs. HLT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHASHLT
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.50%0.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)63.63%9.25%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HAS

--

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.62
Q3
29.98
Median
25.12
Q1
17.43
Min
10.66

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

HLT

39.88

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

A P/E Ratio of 39.88 places HLT in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

HAS vs. HLT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HAS

2.63

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.93
Median
1.67
Q1
1.14
Min
0.43

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the market consensus for the Leisure Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HLT

5.52

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

HLT’s P/S Ratio of 5.52 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HAS vs. HLT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max
7.37
Q3
4.91
Median
3.05
Q1
1.94
Min
1.37

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HLT

245.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 245.97, HLT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HAS vs. HLT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHASHLT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--39.88
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.635.52
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)42.90245.97
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.3829.52