HAL vs. VG: Halliburton vs. Venture Global Stock Comparison
How do Halliburton (HAL) and Venture Global (VG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Halliburton (HAL) and Venture Global (VG) both fall under the Energy industry group, but HAL is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while VG is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
Halliburton (HAL) carries decades of public-market history since June 1, 1972, while Venture Global (VG) listed on January 24, 2025 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the HAL side.
| Profile Item | HAL | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Halliburton Company | Venture Global Inc. Class A |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 26.34 billion USD | 28.83 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 1, 1972 | January 24, 2025 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | HAL | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 18.66% | 49.08% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.16% | -- |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 7.11% | -- |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | HAL | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.27% | 75.79% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.48 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -54.01% | -75.16% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 10.27M | 14.78M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | HAL | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.43 | 0.59 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.64 | 0.90 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Venture Global (VG) at 33.64% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Halliburton (HAL) at 18.78% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for VG.
HAL
Energy industry group
18.78%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- HAL
- 18.78%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
VG
Energy industry group
33.64%
- Max
- 53.85%
- VG
- 33.64%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 8.90% and Venture Global (VG) at 22.05% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
8.90%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- HAL
- 8.90%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
VG
Energy industry group
22.05%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- VG
- 22.05%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Venture Global (VG) at 47.79% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Halliburton (HAL) at 12.43%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
HAL
Energy industry group
12.43%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- HAL
- 12.43%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
VG
Energy industry group
47.79%
- Max
- 71.31%
- VG
- 47.79%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | HAL | VG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 18.78% | 33.64% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.23% | 7.38% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.90% | 22.05% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 12.43% | 47.79% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 14.83% | 46.92% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Venture Global (VG) at 176.93% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Halliburton (HAL) at -3.31%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
EPS Growth
Venture Global (VG) at 41.08% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Halliburton (HAL) at -47.00% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for VG.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | HAL | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -3.31% | 176.93% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.01% | 28.77% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -47.00% | 41.08% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -4.83% | 6.05% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 2.02 and Venture Global (VG) at 1.19 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.02
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- HAL
- 2.02
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
VG
Energy industry group
1.19
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- VG
- 1.19
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Halliburton (HAL) at 0.73 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Venture Global (VG) at 3.55 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
HAL
Energy industry group
0.73
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- HAL
- 0.73
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
VG
Energy industry group
3.55
- VG
- 3.55
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | HAL | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.02 | 1.19 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.73 | 3.55 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.54 | 5.40 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 2.13% and Venture Global (VG) at 0.61% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.13%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- HAL
- 2.13%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VG
Energy industry group
0.61%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- VG
- 0.61%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 28.57% and Venture Global (VG) at 5.51% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
HAL
Energy industry group
28.57%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- HAL
- 28.57%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VG
Energy industry group
5.51%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- VG
- 5.51%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | HAL | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.13% | 0.61% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 28.57% | 5.51% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 13.38 and Venture Global (VG) at 9.08 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
13.38
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- HAL
- 13.38
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
VG
Energy industry group
9.08
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- VG
- 9.08
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Halliburton (HAL) at 1.17 and Venture Global (VG) at 1.70 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
HAL
Energy industry group
1.17
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- HAL
- 1.17
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
VG
Energy industry group
1.70
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- VG
- 1.70
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Halliburton (HAL) at 2.37 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Venture Global (VG) at 3.36 carries an above-peer premium to book — VG is pricier on assets.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.37
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- HAL
- 2.37
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
VG
Energy industry group
3.36
- Max
- 4.21
- VG
- 3.36
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HAL | VG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 13.38 | 9.08 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.17 | 1.70 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.37 | 3.36 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 6.20% | -29.96% |