HAL vs. PBA: Halliburton vs. Pembina Pipeline Stock Comparison
How do Halliburton (HAL) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Halliburton (HAL) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) both fall under the Energy industry group, but HAL is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while PBA is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
| Profile Item | HAL | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Halliburton Company | Pembina Pipeline Corp. |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 26.34 billion USD | 28.08 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 1, 1972 | October 6, 2010 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | HAL | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 18.66% | 35.84% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.16% | 20.26% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 7.11% | 12.46% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Halliburton (HAL) is heavily traded at around 10.27M shares per day, whereas Pembina Pipeline (PBA) sees a more moderate 993.87K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.
| Metric | HAL | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.27% | 20.43% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.59 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -54.01% | -27.37% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 10.27M | 993.87K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | HAL | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.43 | 1.54 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.64 | 2.32 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 18.78% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 12.10% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
HAL
Energy industry group
18.78%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- HAL
- 18.78%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
PBA
Energy industry group
12.10%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- PBA
- 12.10%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 24.78% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Halliburton (HAL) at 8.90%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
HAL
Energy industry group
8.90%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- HAL
- 8.90%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
PBA
Energy industry group
24.78%
- Max
- 56.92%
- PBA
- 24.78%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 12.43% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 32.63% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
HAL
Energy industry group
12.43%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- HAL
- 12.43%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
PBA
Energy industry group
32.63%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- PBA
- 32.63%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | HAL | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 18.78% | 12.10% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.23% | 4.65% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.90% | 24.78% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 12.43% | 32.63% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 14.83% | 38.23% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Halliburton (HAL) at -3.31% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 5.34% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Halliburton (HAL) at -47.00% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at -11.33% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | HAL | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -3.31% | 5.34% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.01% | -12.50% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -47.00% | -11.33% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -4.83% | -19.61% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Halliburton (HAL) at 2.02 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.75 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PBA.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.02
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- HAL
- 2.02
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
PBA
Energy industry group
0.75
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- PBA
- 0.75
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 0.73 and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.80 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
HAL
Energy industry group
0.73
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- HAL
- 0.73
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
PBA
Energy industry group
0.80
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- PBA
- 0.80
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | HAL | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.02 | 0.75 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.73 | 0.80 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.54 | 3.74 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 6.13% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Halliburton (HAL) at 2.13% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, PBA the richer one.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.13%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- HAL
- 2.13%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PBA
Energy industry group
6.13%
- Max
- 8.57%
- PBA
- 6.13%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Halliburton (HAL) at 28.57% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 86.79% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
HAL
Energy industry group
28.57%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- HAL
- 28.57%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PBA
Energy industry group
86.79%
- Max
- 133.24%
- PBA
- 86.79%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | HAL | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.13% | 6.13% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 28.57% | 86.79% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 13.38 and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 20.12 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
13.38
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- HAL
- 13.38
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
PBA
Energy industry group
20.12
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- PBA
- 20.12
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Halliburton (HAL) at 1.17 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 3.36 sits in the pricier quartile — PBA costs more per dollar of sales.
HAL
Energy industry group
1.17
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- HAL
- 1.17
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
PBA
Energy industry group
3.36
- Max
- 5.40
- PBA
- 3.36
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Halliburton (HAL) at 2.37 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 2.55 carries an above-peer premium to book — PBA is pricier on assets.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.37
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- HAL
- 2.37
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
PBA
Energy industry group
2.55
- Max
- 4.21
- PBA
- 2.55
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HAL | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 13.38 | 20.12 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.17 | 3.36 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.37 | 2.55 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 6.20% | 5.53% |