H vs. YUMC: Hyatt Hotels vs. Yum China Stock Comparison
How do Hyatt Hotels (H) and Yum China (YUMC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Hyatt Hotels (H) and Yum China (YUMC) both belong to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, though H is classified under Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines while YUMC falls under Restaurants.
| Profile Item | H | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Hyatt Hotels Corporation Class A Common Stock | Yum China Holdings, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | China |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry Group | Consumer Services | Consumer Services |
| GICS Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines | Restaurants |
| Market Capitalization | 17.21 billion USD | 16.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 5, 2009 | October 17, 2016 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | H | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 19.13% | 17.02% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 20.79% | 6.80% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 15.79% | -0.60% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Hyatt Hotels (H) has an aggressive beta of 1.35, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Yum China (YUMC) is defensive at 0.01 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | H | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.87% | 25.40% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.35 | 0.01 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -37.28% | -53.84% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 781.95K | 1.59M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | H | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.44 | 0.50 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.66 | 0.77 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Hyatt Hotels (H) at 5.25% and Yum China (YUMC) at 17.35% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
H
Consumer Services industry group
5.25%
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- Median
- 15.90%
- H
- 5.25%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
17.35%
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- YUMC
- 17.35%
- Median
- 15.90%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Hyatt Hotels (H) at 5.72% and Yum China (YUMC) at 7.90% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
H
Consumer Services industry group
5.72%
- Max
- 25.52%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- Median
- 6.63%
- H
- 5.72%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
7.90%
- Max
- 25.52%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- YUMC
- 7.90%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Hyatt Hotels (H) at 28.08% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Yum China (YUMC) at 13.09%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
H
Consumer Services industry group
28.08%
- Max
- 49.05%
- H
- 28.08%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
13.09%
- Max
- 49.05%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- YUMC
- 13.09%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | H | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 5.25% | 17.35% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.58% | 7.81% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 5.72% | 7.90% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 28.08% | 13.09% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 46.20% | 20.45% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Hyatt Hotels (H) at 6.81% and Yum China (YUMC) at 4.37% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Yum China (YUMC) at 7.73% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Hyatt Hotels (H) at -104.35% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | H | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 6.81% | 4.37% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.43% | 7.23% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -104.35% | 7.73% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 34.14% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Hyatt Hotels (H) at 0.63 and Yum China (YUMC) at 0.67 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
H
Consumer Services industry group
0.63
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.72
- H
- 0.63
- Min
- 0.22
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
0.67
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.72
- YUMC
- 0.67
- Min
- 0.22
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Hyatt Hotels (H) at 1.33 and Yum China (YUMC) at 0.54 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
H
Consumer Services industry group
1.33
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- H
- 1.33
- Median
- 1.29
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
0.54
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- Median
- 1.29
- YUMC
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | H | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.63 | 0.67 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.33 | 0.54 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.55 | 0.85 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Yum China (YUMC) at 2.23% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Hyatt Hotels (H) at 0.33% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, YUMC the richer one.
H
Consumer Services industry group
0.33%
- Max
- 4.10%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- H
- 0.33%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
2.23%
- Max
- 4.10%
- YUMC
- 2.23%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Hyatt Hotels (H) at 31.25% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Yum China (YUMC) at 38.54% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
H
Consumer Services industry group
31.25%
- Max
- 89.80%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- H
- 31.25%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
38.54%
- Max
- 89.80%
- YUMC
- 38.54%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | H | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.33% | 2.23% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.25% | 38.54% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Yum China (YUMC) at 17.34 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Hyatt Hotels (H) at 96.00 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for H’s trailing earnings.
H
Consumer Services industry group
96.00
- H
- 96.00
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- Median
- 21.88
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
17.34
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- Median
- 21.88
- YUMC
- 17.34
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Yum China (YUMC) at 1.32 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Hyatt Hotels (H) at 5.29 sits in the pricier quartile — H costs more per dollar of sales.
H
Consumer Services industry group
5.29
- Max
- 6.40
- H
- 5.29
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
1.32
- Max
- 6.40
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- YUMC
- 1.32
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Hyatt Hotels (H) at 5.40 and Yum China (YUMC) at 3.19 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
H
Consumer Services industry group
5.40
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- H
- 5.40
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
3.19
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- YUMC
- 3.19
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | H | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 96.00 | 17.34 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 5.29 | 1.32 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 5.40 | 3.19 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 1.12% | -2.30% |