H vs. QSR: Hyatt Hotels vs. Restaurant Brands Stock Comparison
How do Hyatt Hotels (H) and Restaurant Brands (QSR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Hyatt Hotels (H) and Restaurant Brands (QSR) both belong to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, though H is classified under Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines while QSR falls under Restaurants.
| Profile Item | H | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Hyatt Hotels Corporation Class A Common Stock | Restaurant Brands International Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry Group | Consumer Services | Consumer Services |
| GICS Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines | Restaurants |
| Market Capitalization | 17.21 billion USD | 35.56 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 5, 2009 | December 11, 2014 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | H | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 19.13% | 19.01% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 20.79% | 7.95% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 15.79% | 9.80% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Hyatt Hotels (H) has an aggressive beta of 1.35, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Restaurant Brands (QSR) is defensive at 0.54 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | H | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.87% | 24.79% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.35 | 0.54 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -37.28% | -24.53% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 781.95K | 2.91M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | H | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.44 | 0.59 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.66 | 0.89 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 39.05% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Hyatt Hotels (H) at 5.25% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for QSR.
H
Consumer Services industry group
5.25%
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- Median
- 15.90%
- H
- 5.25%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
39.05%
- Max
- 76.75%
- QSR
- 39.05%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- Median
- 15.90%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
Net Margin (TTM)
Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 15.35% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Hyatt Hotels (H) at 5.72%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
H
Consumer Services industry group
5.72%
- Max
- 25.52%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- Median
- 6.63%
- H
- 5.72%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
15.35%
- Max
- 25.52%
- QSR
- 15.35%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Hyatt Hotels (H) at 28.08% and Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 27.92% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
H
Consumer Services industry group
28.08%
- Max
- 49.05%
- H
- 28.08%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
27.92%
- Max
- 49.05%
- QSR
- 27.92%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | H | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 5.25% | 39.05% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.58% | 6.48% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 5.72% | 15.35% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 28.08% | 27.92% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 46.20% | 34.33% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Hyatt Hotels (H) at 6.81% and Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 12.23% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Restaurant Brands (QSR) at -26.10% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Hyatt Hotels (H) at -104.35% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | H | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 6.81% | 12.23% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.43% | 13.19% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -104.35% | -26.10% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -10.24% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 0.96 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Hyatt Hotels (H) at 0.63 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for H.
H
Consumer Services industry group
0.63
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.72
- H
- 0.63
- Min
- 0.22
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
0.96
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- QSR
- 0.96
- Q1
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.22
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Hyatt Hotels (H) at 1.33 and Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 2.84 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
H
Consumer Services industry group
1.33
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- H
- 1.33
- Median
- 1.29
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
2.84
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- QSR
- 2.84
- Median
- 1.29
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | H | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.63 | 0.96 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.33 | 2.84 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.55 | 4.98 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 3.27% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Hyatt Hotels (H) at 0.33% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, QSR the richer one.
H
Consumer Services industry group
0.33%
- Max
- 4.10%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- H
- 0.33%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
3.27%
- Max
- 4.10%
- QSR
- 3.27%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Hyatt Hotels (H) at 31.25% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 56.48% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
H
Consumer Services industry group
31.25%
- Max
- 89.80%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- H
- 31.25%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
56.48%
- Max
- 89.80%
- QSR
- 56.48%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | H | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.33% | 3.27% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.25% | 56.48% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 17.07 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Hyatt Hotels (H) at 96.00 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for H’s trailing earnings.
H
Consumer Services industry group
96.00
- H
- 96.00
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- Median
- 21.88
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
17.07
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- Median
- 21.88
- QSR
- 17.07
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Hyatt Hotels (H) at 5.29 and Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 3.64 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
H
Consumer Services industry group
5.29
- Max
- 6.40
- H
- 5.29
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
3.64
- Max
- 6.40
- QSR
- 3.64
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Hyatt Hotels (H) at 5.40 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 6.87 carries an above-peer premium to book — QSR is pricier on assets.
H
Consumer Services industry group
5.40
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- H
- 5.40
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
6.87
- Max
- 12.02
- QSR
- 6.87
- Q3
- 5.58
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | H | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 96.00 | 17.07 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 5.29 | 3.64 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 5.40 | 6.87 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 1.12% | 4.48% |