Seek Returns logo

GWW vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GWW and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGWWVRSK
Company NameW.W. Grainger, Inc.Verisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryTrading Companies & DistributorsProfessional Services
Market Capitalization45.91 billion USD34.87 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GWW and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GWW vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGWWVRSK
5-Day Price Return0.00%3.52%
13-Week Price Return-8.39%-19.26%
26-Week Price Return-3.57%-13.88%
52-Week Price Return-8.01%-4.82%
Month-to-Date Return-5.97%-6.20%
Year-to-Date Return-9.59%-8.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.30M1.49M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.30M1.05M
3-Month Volatility28.09%22.69%
Beta1.180.86

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GWW

54.86%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.99%
Q3
19.66%
Median
13.72%
Q1
9.74%
Min
-0.34%

GWW’s Return on Equity of 54.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VRSK

439.17%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 439.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GWW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GWW

10.99%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
16.11%
Q3
9.48%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.68%
Min
-1.09%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.99% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRSK

30.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.67% places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GWW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GWW

15.27%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
26.26%
Q3
14.59%
Median
7.05%
Q1
4.94%
Min
-8.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 15.27% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRSK

43.94%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

GWW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGWWVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)54.86%439.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)21.63%19.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.99%30.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.27%43.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.25%69.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GWW

2.82

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
2.27
Median
1.60
Q1
1.41
Min
0.26

GWW’s Current Ratio of 2.82 is in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VRSK

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GWW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GWW

0.64

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.93
Q3
1.24
Median
0.79
Q1
0.61
Min
0.01

GWW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64 is typical for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VRSK

10.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.43, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GWW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GWW

34.56

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.67
Q1
2.04
Min
-1.67

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.56, GWW demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GWW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGWWVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.821.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.531.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.6410.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)34.5643.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

GWW vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GWW vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GWW

0.97%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
5.25%
Q3
2.95%
Median
2.06%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Yield of 0.97% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

VRSK

0.68%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GWW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GWW

22.89%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
136.12%
Q3
71.34%
Median
47.49%
Q1
22.56%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.89% is within the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRSK

25.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.76% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GWW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGWWVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.97%0.68%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.89%25.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GWW

23.61

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
42.69
Q3
25.21
Median
16.99
Q1
13.13
Min
5.35

GWW’s P/E Ratio of 23.61 is within the middle range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRSK

37.93

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

A P/E Ratio of 37.93 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GWW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GWW

2.60

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.71
Median
1.06
Q1
0.70
Min
0.30

GWW’s P/S Ratio of 2.60 aligns with the market consensus for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VRSK

11.64

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

With a P/S Ratio of 11.64, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GWW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GWW

13.60

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.63
Median
2.09
Q1
1.30
Min
0.31

At 13.60, GWW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRSK

139.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

At 139.79, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GWW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGWWVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.6137.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.6011.64
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)13.60139.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)32.0534.05