Seek Returns logo

GWW vs. STN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GWW and STN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGWWSTN
Company NameW.W. Grainger, Inc.Stantec Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryTrading Companies & DistributorsConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization47.81 billion USD12.15 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973August 5, 2005
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GWW and STN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GWW vs. STN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGWWSTN
5-Day Price Return2.57%-0.40%
13-Week Price Return-9.16%5.18%
26-Week Price Return-2.74%35.70%
52-Week Price Return4.33%32.54%
Month-to-Date Return-3.84%-1.66%
Year-to-Date Return-5.16%32.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.29M0.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.28M0.27M
3-Month Volatility26.99%15.63%
Beta1.200.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GWW

54.86%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

GWW’s Return on Equity of 54.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

STN

15.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

STN’s Return on Equity of 15.34% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GWW vs. STN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GWW

10.99%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.99% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

STN

7.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.10% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GWW vs. STN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GWW

15.27%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

An Operating Profit Margin of 15.27% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

STN

9.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

STN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.22% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GWW vs. STN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGWWSTN
Return on Equity (TTM)54.86%15.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)21.63%6.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.99%7.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.27%9.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.25%54.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GWW

2.82

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

GWW’s Current Ratio of 2.82 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

STN

1.29

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

STN’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GWW vs. STN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GWW

0.64

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

GWW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64 is typical for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

STN

0.69

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

STN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GWW vs. STN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GWW

34.56

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.56, GWW demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

STN

60.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 60.60, STN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GWW vs. STN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGWWSTN
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.821.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.531.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.640.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)34.5660.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

GWW vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GWW vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GWW

0.92%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Yield of 0.92% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

STN

0.57%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Yield of 0.57% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GWW vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GWW

22.89%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.89% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

STN

22.30%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.30% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GWW vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGWWSTN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.92%0.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.89%22.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GWW

24.84

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

GWW’s P/E Ratio of 24.84 is within the middle range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

STN

38.90

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 38.90, STN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GWW vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GWW

2.73

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

GWW’s P/S Ratio of 2.73 is in the upper echelon for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

STN

2.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

STN’s P/S Ratio of 2.76 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GWW vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GWW

13.60

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

At 13.60, GWW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

STN

4.38

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

STN’s P/B Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GWW vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGWWSTN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.8438.90
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.732.76
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)13.604.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.7227.08