Seek Returns logo

GWW vs. PONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GWW and PONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GWW is a standard domestic listing, while PONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolGWWPONY
Company NameW.W. Grainger, Inc.Pony AI Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryTrading Companies & DistributorsSoftware
Market Capitalization45.76 billion USD8.41 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973November 27, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GWW and PONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GWW vs. PONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGWWPONY
5-Day Price Return0.91%4.18%
13-Week Price Return-8.94%84.06%
26-Week Price Return-3.16%168.37%
52-Week Price Return-7.85%--
Month-to-Date Return0.38%5.25%
Year-to-Date Return-9.25%64.95%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.27M8.94M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.30M9.54M
3-Month Volatility27.87%69.66%
Beta1.132.80

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GWW

54.86%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.99%
Q3
19.66%
Median
13.72%
Q1
9.74%
Min
-0.34%

GWW’s Return on Equity of 54.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PONY

-41.07%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

PONY has a negative Return on Equity of -41.07%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GWW vs. PONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GWW

10.99%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
16.11%
Q3
9.48%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.68%
Min
-1.09%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.99% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PONY

-521.79%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

PONY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -521.79%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GWW vs. PONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GWW

15.27%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
26.26%
Q3
14.59%
Median
7.05%
Q1
4.94%
Min
-8.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 15.27% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PONY

-567.77%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

PONY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -567.77%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GWW vs. PONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGWWPONY
Return on Equity (TTM)54.86%-41.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)21.63%-36.85%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.99%-521.79%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.27%-567.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.25%24.22%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GWW

2.82

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
2.27
Median
1.60
Q1
1.41
Min
0.26

GWW’s Current Ratio of 2.82 is in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PONY

6.19

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

PONY’s Current Ratio of 6.19 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GWW vs. PONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GWW

0.64

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.93
Q3
1.24
Median
0.79
Q1
0.61
Min
0.01

GWW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64 is typical for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PONY

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

PONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GWW vs. PONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GWW

34.56

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.67
Q1
2.04
Min
-1.67

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.56, GWW demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

PONY

--

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

Interest Coverage Ratio data for PONY is currently unavailable.

GWW vs. PONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGWWPONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.826.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.535.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.640.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)34.56--

Growth

Revenue Growth

GWW vs. PONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GWW vs. PONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GWW

0.96%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
5.25%
Q3
2.95%
Median
2.06%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Yield of 0.96% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PONY

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PONY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GWW vs. PONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GWW

22.89%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
136.12%
Q3
71.34%
Median
47.49%
Q1
22.56%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.89% is within the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PONY

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PONY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GWW vs. PONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGWWPONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.96%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.89%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GWW

23.88

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
42.69
Q3
25.21
Median
16.99
Q1
13.13
Min
5.35

GWW’s P/E Ratio of 23.88 is within the middle range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PONY

--

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

P/E Ratio data for PONY is currently unavailable.

GWW vs. PONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GWW

2.63

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.71
Median
1.06
Q1
0.70
Min
0.30

GWW’s P/S Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the market consensus for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PONY

118.79

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

With a P/S Ratio of 118.79, PONY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GWW vs. PONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GWW

13.60

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.63
Median
2.09
Q1
1.30
Min
0.31

At 13.60, GWW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PONY

5.50

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

PONY’s P/B Ratio of 5.50 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GWW vs. PONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGWWPONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.88--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.63118.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)13.605.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)32.41--