Seek Returns logo

GWW vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GWW and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GWW is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolGWWPAC
Company NameW.W. Grainger, Inc.Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
CountryUnited StatesMexico
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryTrading Companies & DistributorsTransportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization46.26 billion USD11.66 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973February 27, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GWW and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GWW vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGWWPAC
5-Day Price Return1.41%-1.30%
13-Week Price Return-7.47%-0.75%
26-Week Price Return-0.64%9.88%
52-Week Price Return-5.44%29.81%
Month-to-Date Return1.49%-2.23%
Year-to-Date Return-8.24%15.47%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.25M0.79M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.30M0.69M
3-Month Volatility27.61%22.05%
Beta1.131.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GWW

54.86%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.99%
Q3
19.66%
Median
13.72%
Q1
9.74%
Min
-0.34%

GWW’s Return on Equity of 54.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
15.14%
Median
10.37%
Q1
6.63%
Min
1.67%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GWW vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GWW

10.99%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
16.11%
Q3
9.48%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.68%
Min
-1.09%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.99% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
56.87%
Q3
32.94%
Median
20.37%
Q1
11.21%
Min
1.22%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GWW vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GWW

15.27%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
26.26%
Q3
14.59%
Median
7.05%
Q1
4.94%
Min
-8.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 15.27% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
60.60%
Q3
46.73%
Median
31.03%
Q1
15.90%
Min
1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GWW vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGWWPAC
Return on Equity (TTM)54.86%42.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)21.63%11.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.99%23.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.27%42.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.25%100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GWW

2.82

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
2.27
Median
1.60
Q1
1.41
Min
0.26

GWW’s Current Ratio of 2.82 is in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.90
Q3
1.82
Median
1.16
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GWW vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GWW

0.64

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.93
Q3
1.24
Median
0.79
Q1
0.61
Min
0.01

GWW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64 is typical for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.23
Q3
1.64
Median
0.83
Q1
0.27
Min
0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GWW vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GWW

34.56

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.67
Q1
2.04
Min
-1.67

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.56, GWW demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
29.26
Q3
20.45
Median
7.97
Q1
4.97
Min
2.01

PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GWW vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGWWPAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.820.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.530.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.642.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)34.565.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

GWW vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GWW vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GWW

0.97%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
5.25%
Q3
2.95%
Median
2.06%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Yield of 0.97% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PAC

2.55%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.64%
Q3
4.96%
Median
2.38%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.55% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GWW vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GWW

22.89%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
136.12%
Q3
71.34%
Median
47.49%
Q1
22.56%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.89% is within the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
206.16%
Q3
111.39%
Median
71.16%
Q1
37.58%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GWW vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGWWPAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.97%2.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.89%71.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GWW

23.66

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
42.69
Q3
25.21
Median
16.99
Q1
13.13
Min
5.35

GWW’s P/E Ratio of 23.66 is within the middle range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAC

19.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
33.87
Q3
28.56
Median
17.26
Q1
11.95
Min
6.33

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.58 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GWW vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GWW

2.60

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.71
Median
1.06
Q1
0.70
Min
0.30

GWW’s P/S Ratio of 2.60 aligns with the market consensus for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PAC

4.54

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
10.89
Q3
5.40
Median
3.20
Q1
1.62
Min
0.87

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GWW vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GWW

13.60

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.63
Median
2.09
Q1
1.30
Min
0.31

At 13.60, GWW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.74
Q3
3.00
Median
1.96
Q1
1.22
Min
0.38

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GWW vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGWWPAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.6619.58
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.604.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)13.609.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)32.1118.06