Seek Returns logo

GTM vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GTM and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGTMUBER
Company NameZoomInfo Technologies Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesIndustrials
GICS IndustryInteractive Media & ServicesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization11.33 billion USD201.85 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 4, 2020May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GTM and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GTM vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGTMUBER
5-Day Price Return1.90%2.99%
13-Week Price Return12.92%9.16%
26-Week Price Return--18.78%
52-Week Price Return--31.72%
Month-to-Date Return-0.74%10.30%
Year-to-Date Return7.18%60.46%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.49M15.77M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.64M20.55M
3-Month Volatility43.18%30.00%
Beta1.831.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GTM

5.44%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
29.69%
Median
9.73%
Q1
2.47%
Min
-26.19%

GTM’s Return on Equity of 5.44% is on par with the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GTM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GTM

7.28%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.41%
Q3
29.38%
Median
17.14%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-30.88%

GTM’s Net Profit Margin of 7.28% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GTM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GTM

13.26%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.95%
Median
18.60%
Q1
5.69%
Min
-18.13%

GTM’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.26% is around the midpoint for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GTM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGTMUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)5.44%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.39%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.28%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.26%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)83.90%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GTM

0.71

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
4.30
Q3
2.68
Median
1.96
Q1
1.21
Min
0.45

GTM’s Current Ratio of 0.71 falls into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GTM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GTM

0.85

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.90
Q3
0.47
Median
0.16
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

GTM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Interactive Media & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.85. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GTM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GTM

2.05

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
67.60
Q3
29.41
Median
6.36
Q1
-0.87
Min
-37.02

GTM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GTM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGTMUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.711.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.620.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.850.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.05-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

GTM vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GTM vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GTM

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
1.87%
Q3
1.08%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GTM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GTM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GTM

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.35%
Q3
38.67%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GTM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GTM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGTMUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GTM

36.08

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.79
Q3
54.33
Median
25.46
Q1
18.76
Min
6.96

GTM’s P/E Ratio of 36.08 is within the middle range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GTM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GTM

2.63

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
19.01
Q3
12.39
Median
6.49
Q1
1.94
Min
0.22

GTM’s P/S Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the market consensus for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GTM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GTM

2.21

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
11.66
Q3
7.17
Median
4.17
Q1
2.80
Min
0.12

GTM’s P/B Ratio of 2.21 is in the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GTM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGTMUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)36.0815.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.634.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.218.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.6022.90