Seek Returns logo

GTM vs. TEAM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GTM and TEAM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGTMTEAM
Company NameZoomInfo Technologies Inc.Atlassian Corporation
CountryUnited StatesAustralia
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryInteractive Media & ServicesSoftware
Market Capitalization3.47 billion USD43.72 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 4, 2020December 9, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GTM and TEAM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GTM vs. TEAM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGTMTEAM
5-Day Price Return-5.21%-2.52%
13-Week Price Return7.81%-21.36%
26-Week Price Return---30.46%
52-Week Price Return---0.94%
Month-to-Date Return0.09%-10.17%
Year-to-Date Return8.77%-34.38%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.17M2.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.47M2.43M
3-Month Volatility49.21%43.64%
Beta1.920.96

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GTM

5.44%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
33.08%
Median
10.37%
Q1
5.76%
Min
-24.17%

GTM’s Return on Equity of 5.44% is in the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TEAM

-20.69%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

TEAM has a negative Return on Equity of -20.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GTM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GTM

7.28%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.74%
Q3
29.54%
Median
20.53%
Q1
7.52%
Min
-14.52%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, GTM’s Net Profit Margin of 7.28% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TEAM

-4.92%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

TEAM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GTM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GTM

13.26%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.82%
Median
18.53%
Q1
7.69%
Min
-18.13%

GTM’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.26% is around the midpoint for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TEAM

-2.50%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

TEAM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.50%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GTM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGTMTEAM
Return on Equity (TTM)5.44%-20.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.39%-4.59%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.28%-4.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.26%-2.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)83.90%82.84%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GTM

0.71

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.72
Median
1.85
Q1
1.20
Min
0.25

GTM’s Current Ratio of 0.71 falls into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TEAM

1.22

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

TEAM’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GTM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GTM

0.85

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.85
Q3
0.49
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

GTM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Interactive Media & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.85. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TEAM

0.73

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

TEAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.73 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GTM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GTM

2.05

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.65
Q3
16.48
Median
6.73
Q1
-0.87
Min
-3.62

GTM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TEAM

-11.02

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

TEAM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -11.02. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GTM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGTMTEAM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.711.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.621.17
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.850.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.05-11.02

Growth

Revenue Growth

GTM vs. TEAM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GTM vs. TEAM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GTM

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.07%
Q3
1.27%
Median
0.28%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GTM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GTM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GTM

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
101.53%
Q3
40.64%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GTM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GTM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGTMTEAM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GTM

36.69

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.72
Q3
41.60
Median
25.84
Q1
18.18
Min
1.76

GTM’s P/E Ratio of 36.69 is within the middle range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TEAM

--

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

P/E Ratio data for TEAM is currently unavailable.

GTM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GTM

2.67

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.76
Q3
11.40
Median
7.69
Q1
2.49
Min
0.00

GTM’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TEAM

7.52

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

TEAM’s P/S Ratio of 7.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GTM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GTM

2.21

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
16.71
Q3
9.00
Median
3.97
Q1
2.19
Min
0.33

GTM’s P/B Ratio of 2.21 is within the conventional range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TEAM

39.62

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

At 39.62, TEAM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GTM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGTMTEAM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)36.69--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.677.52
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.2139.62
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.7927.72