Seek Returns logo

GTM vs. SONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GTM and SONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GTM is a standard domestic listing, while SONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolGTMSONY
Company NameZoomInfo Technologies Inc.Sony Group Corporation
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryInteractive Media & ServicesHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization11.03 billion USD169.87 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 4, 2020February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GTM and SONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GTM vs. SONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGTMSONY
5-Day Price Return1.45%0.91%
13-Week Price Return9.53%15.52%
26-Week Price Return--23.78%
52-Week Price Return--13.72%
Month-to-Date Return-3.42%14.64%
Year-to-Date Return4.29%25.29%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.14M16.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.62M14.24M
3-Month Volatility43.37%30.48%
Beta1.831.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GTM

5.44%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
29.69%
Median
9.73%
Q1
2.47%
Min
-26.19%

GTM’s Return on Equity of 5.44% is on par with the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GTM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GTM

7.28%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.41%
Q3
29.38%
Median
17.14%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-30.88%

GTM’s Net Profit Margin of 7.28% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.13% places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GTM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GTM

13.26%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.95%
Median
18.60%
Q1
5.69%
Min
-18.13%

GTM’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.26% is around the midpoint for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GTM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGTMSONY
Return on Equity (TTM)5.44%14.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.39%3.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.28%9.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.26%11.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)83.90%31.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GTM

0.71

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
4.30
Q3
2.68
Median
1.96
Q1
1.21
Min
0.45

GTM’s Current Ratio of 0.71 falls into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GTM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GTM

0.85

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.90
Q3
0.47
Median
0.16
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

GTM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Interactive Media & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.85. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GTM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GTM

2.05

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
67.60
Q3
29.41
Median
6.36
Q1
-0.87
Min
-37.02

GTM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

GTM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGTMSONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.711.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.621.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.850.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.05104.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

GTM vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GTM vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GTM

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
1.87%
Q3
1.08%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GTM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SONY

0.47%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GTM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GTM

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.35%
Q3
38.67%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GTM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GTM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGTMSONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%10.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GTM

36.08

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.79
Q3
54.33
Median
25.46
Q1
18.76
Min
6.96

GTM’s P/E Ratio of 36.08 is within the middle range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SONY

22.21

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 22.21 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GTM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GTM

2.63

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
19.01
Q3
12.39
Median
6.49
Q1
1.94
Min
0.22

GTM’s P/S Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the market consensus for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SONY

2.03

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GTM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GTM

2.21

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
11.66
Q3
7.17
Median
4.17
Q1
2.80
Min
0.12

GTM’s P/B Ratio of 2.21 is in the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GTM vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGTMSONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)36.0822.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.632.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.212.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.6012.66