Seek Returns logo

GTM vs. KLAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GTM and KLAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGTMKLAC
Company NameZoomInfo Technologies Inc.KLA Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryInteractive Media & ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization3.47 billion USD148.65 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 4, 2020October 8, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GTM and KLAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GTM vs. KLAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGTMKLAC
5-Day Price Return-5.21%0.93%
13-Week Price Return7.81%20.41%
26-Week Price Return--52.88%
52-Week Price Return--37.86%
Month-to-Date Return0.09%23.69%
Year-to-Date Return8.77%71.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.17M0.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.47M1.03M
3-Month Volatility49.21%33.33%
Beta1.921.52

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GTM

5.44%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
33.08%
Median
10.37%
Q1
5.76%
Min
-24.17%

GTM’s Return on Equity of 5.44% is in the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

KLAC

102.56%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

KLAC’s Return on Equity of 102.56% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GTM vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GTM

7.28%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.74%
Q3
29.54%
Median
20.53%
Q1
7.52%
Min
-14.52%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, GTM’s Net Profit Margin of 7.28% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

KLAC

33.41%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 33.41% places KLAC in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GTM vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GTM

13.26%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.82%
Median
18.53%
Q1
7.69%
Min
-18.13%

GTM’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.26% is around the midpoint for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KLAC

39.28%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.28% places KLAC in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GTM vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGTMKLAC
Return on Equity (TTM)5.44%102.56%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.39%26.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.28%33.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.26%39.28%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)83.90%61.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GTM

0.71

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.72
Median
1.85
Q1
1.20
Min
0.25

GTM’s Current Ratio of 0.71 falls into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

KLAC

2.62

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

KLAC’s Current Ratio of 2.62 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GTM vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GTM

0.85

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.85
Q3
0.49
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

GTM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Interactive Media & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.85. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

KLAC

1.25

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.25, KLAC operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GTM vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GTM

2.05

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.65
Q3
16.48
Median
6.73
Q1
-0.87
Min
-3.62

GTM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KLAC

38.22

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

KLAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GTM vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGTMKLAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.712.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.621.78
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.851.25
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.0538.22

Growth

Revenue Growth

GTM vs. KLAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GTM vs. KLAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GTM

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.07%
Q3
1.27%
Median
0.28%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GTM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KLAC

0.61%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KLAC’s Dividend Yield of 0.61% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GTM vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GTM

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
101.53%
Q3
40.64%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GTM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KLAC

22.27%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KLAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.27% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GTM vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGTMKLAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%22.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GTM

36.69

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.72
Q3
41.60
Median
25.84
Q1
18.18
Min
1.76

GTM’s P/E Ratio of 36.69 is within the middle range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KLAC

36.63

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

KLAC’s P/E Ratio of 36.63 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GTM vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GTM

2.67

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.76
Q3
11.40
Median
7.69
Q1
2.49
Min
0.00

GTM’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KLAC

12.24

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

KLAC’s P/S Ratio of 12.24 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GTM vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GTM

2.21

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
16.71
Q3
9.00
Median
3.97
Q1
2.19
Min
0.33

GTM’s P/B Ratio of 2.21 is within the conventional range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KLAC

25.24

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

At 25.24, KLAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GTM vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGTMKLAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)36.6936.63
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.6712.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.2125.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.7939.77