Seek Returns logo

GTLS vs. SMR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GTLS and SMR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGTLSSMR
Company NameChart Industries, Inc.NuScale Power Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization9.01 billion USD5.17 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 26, 2006March 1, 2022
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GTLS and SMR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GTLS vs. SMR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGTLSSMR
5-Day Price Return0.28%-9.25%
13-Week Price Return21.56%-9.00%
26-Week Price Return27.51%110.28%
52-Week Price Return59.23%186.85%
Month-to-Date Return0.40%3.90%
Year-to-Date Return4.88%100.78%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.90M22.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.98M15.59M
3-Month Volatility36.41%93.02%
Beta1.812.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GTLS

9.03%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

GTLS’s Return on Equity of 9.03% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SMR

-22.81%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

SMR has a negative Return on Equity of -22.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GTLS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GTLS

6.45%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

GTLS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.45% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SMR

-221.07%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

SMR has a negative Net Profit Margin of -221.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GTLS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GTLS

16.19%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.19% places GTLS in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SMR

-233.90%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

SMR has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -233.90%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GTLS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGTLSSMR
Return on Equity (TTM)9.03%-22.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.91%-24.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.45%-221.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.19%-233.90%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.82%71.50%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GTLS

1.55

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

GTLS’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SMR

4.22

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

SMR’s Current Ratio of 4.22 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GTLS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GTLS

1.10

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

GTLS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Machinery industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.10. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SMR

0.00

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, SMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GTLS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GTLS

2.02

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, GTLS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SMR

-58.59

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

SMR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -58.59. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GTLS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGTLSSMR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.554.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.194.18
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.100.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.02-58.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

GTLS vs. SMR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GTLS vs. SMR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GTLS

0.30%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

GTLS’s Dividend Yield of 0.30% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SMR

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GTLS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GTLS

9.92%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

GTLS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.92% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

SMR

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GTLS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGTLSSMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.30%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)9.92%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GTLS

32.86

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

A P/E Ratio of 32.86 places GTLS in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SMR

--

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

P/E Ratio data for SMR is currently unavailable.

GTLS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GTLS

2.12

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

GTLS’s P/S Ratio of 2.12 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SMR

185.81

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

With a P/S Ratio of 185.81, SMR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electrical Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GTLS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GTLS

2.21

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

GTLS’s P/B Ratio of 2.21 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SMR

16.24

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

At 16.24, SMR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GTLS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGTLSSMR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.86--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.12185.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.2116.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.17--