Seek Returns logo

GTLB vs. MNDY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GTLB and MNDY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGTLBMNDY
Company NameGitLab Inc.monday.com Ltd.
CountryUnited StatesIsrael
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareSoftware
Market Capitalization7.22 billion USD8.94 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 14, 2021June 10, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GTLB and MNDY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GTLB vs. MNDY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGTLBMNDY
5-Day Price Return6.72%-2.01%
13-Week Price Return-10.73%-40.24%
26-Week Price Return-38.07%-45.88%
52-Week Price Return-5.74%-35.79%
Month-to-Date Return-0.25%-33.90%
Year-to-Date Return-22.45%-26.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.93M2.82M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.98M0.82M
3-Month Volatility50.96%69.09%
Beta0.711.29

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GTLB

1.69%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

GTLB’s Return on Equity of 1.69% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MNDY

3.72%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

MNDY’s Return on Equity of 3.72% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GTLB vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GTLB

1.55%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

GTLB’s Net Profit Margin of 1.55% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MNDY

3.63%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

MNDY’s Net Profit Margin of 3.63% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GTLB vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GTLB

-15.37%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

GTLB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -15.37%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MNDY

-1.78%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

MNDY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.78%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GTLB vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGTLBMNDY
Return on Equity (TTM)1.69%3.72%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.91%2.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.55%3.63%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-15.37%-1.78%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)88.64%89.42%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GTLB

2.48

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

GTLB’s Current Ratio of 2.48 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MNDY

2.64

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

MNDY’s Current Ratio of 2.64 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GTLB vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GTLB

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

GTLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MNDY

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

MNDY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GTLB vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GTLB

-4.60

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

GTLB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.60. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MNDY

-465.78

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

MNDY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -465.78. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GTLB vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGTLBMNDY
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.482.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.412.51
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-4.60-465.78

Growth

Revenue Growth

GTLB vs. MNDY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GTLB vs. MNDY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GTLB

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GTLB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MNDY

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MNDY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GTLB vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GTLB

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GTLB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MNDY

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MNDY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GTLB vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGTLBMNDY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GTLB

580.18

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

At 580.18, GTLB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Software industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MNDY

220.19

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

At 220.19, MNDY’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Software industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GTLB vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GTLB

8.97

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

GTLB’s P/S Ratio of 8.97 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MNDY

8.00

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

MNDY’s P/S Ratio of 8.00 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GTLB vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GTLB

9.53

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

GTLB’s P/B Ratio of 9.53 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MNDY

13.56

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

MNDY’s P/B Ratio of 13.56 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GTLB vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGTLBMNDY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)580.18220.19
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.978.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.5313.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.4927.28