Seek Returns logo

GSK vs. WAT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GSK and WAT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GSK trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, WAT is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolGSKWAT
Company NameGSK plcWaters Corporation
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryPharmaceuticalsLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization94.77 billion USD23.46 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 28, 1980November 17, 1995
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GSK and WAT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GSK vs. WAT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGSKWAT
5-Day Price Return-1.32%-0.21%
13-Week Price Return17.96%30.36%
26-Week Price Return23.11%5.60%
52-Week Price Return31.18%9.84%
Month-to-Date Return-1.12%8.30%
Year-to-Date Return30.75%2.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.12M0.52M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.56M0.75M
3-Month Volatility24.91%31.72%
Beta0.971.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GSK

37.40%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.95%
Q3
20.34%
Median
11.59%
Q1
3.32%
Min
-10.91%

In the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, GSK’s Return on Equity of 37.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

WAT

31.34%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
23.81%
Q3
11.79%
Median
7.51%
Q1
3.14%
Min
-6.95%

WAT’s Return on Equity of 31.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GSK vs. WAT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GSK

17.08%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
39.07%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.48%
Q1
5.73%
Min
-8.86%

GSK’s Net Profit Margin of 17.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

WAT

20.89%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.77%
Q3
17.97%
Median
8.97%
Q1
3.80%
Min
-11.89%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.89% places WAT in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GSK vs. WAT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GSK

23.42%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.58%
Q3
24.35%
Median
18.05%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-11.88%

GSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.42% is around the midpoint for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WAT

26.54%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
31.55%
Q3
21.26%
Median
14.06%
Q1
8.54%
Min
0.11%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.54% places WAT in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GSK vs. WAT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGSKWAT
Return on Equity (TTM)37.40%31.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.13%13.86%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.08%20.89%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.42%26.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)72.52%58.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GSK

0.84

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
5.45
Q3
2.99
Median
1.98
Q1
1.29
Min
0.78

GSK’s Current Ratio of 0.84 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

WAT

1.53

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.87
Median
1.75
Q1
1.37
Min
0.57

WAT’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GSK vs. WAT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GSK

1.10

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
1.79
Q3
0.78
Median
0.31
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

GSK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Pharmaceuticals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.10. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

WAT

0.60

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
0.95
Q3
0.70
Median
0.45
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

WAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GSK vs. WAT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GSK

2.37

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
43.60
Median
10.15
Q1
2.37
Min
-42.71

GSK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.37 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WAT

11.29

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

WAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.29 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GSK vs. WAT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGSKWAT
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.841.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.551.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.100.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.3711.29

Growth

Revenue Growth

GSK vs. WAT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GSK vs. WAT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GSK

3.56%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.72%
Q3
3.48%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.56%, GSK offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

WAT

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.02%
Q3
0.67%
Median
0.32%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GSK vs. WAT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GSK

46.05%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
199.58%
Q3
85.87%
Median
49.36%
Q1
1.12%
Min
0.00%

GSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.05% is within the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WAT

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
97.67%
Q3
61.34%
Median
18.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WAT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GSK vs. WAT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGSKWAT
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.56%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)46.05%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GSK

12.94

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
52.64
Q3
29.89
Median
20.77
Q1
13.37
Min
5.71

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, GSK’s P/E Ratio of 12.94 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

WAT

34.06

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
78.22
Q3
57.42
Median
34.18
Q1
28.39
Min
1.55

WAT’s P/E Ratio of 34.06 is within the middle range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GSK vs. WAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GSK

2.21

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
8.74
Q3
4.66
Median
2.37
Q1
1.67
Min
0.11

GSK’s P/S Ratio of 2.21 aligns with the market consensus for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WAT

7.12

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.69
Q3
6.37
Median
4.95
Q1
3.27
Min
1.04

WAT’s P/S Ratio of 7.12 is in the upper echelon for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GSK vs. WAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GSK

3.97

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.86
Q3
5.28
Median
2.48
Q1
1.57
Min
0.59

GSK’s P/B Ratio of 3.97 is within the conventional range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

WAT

7.39

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
5.04
Median
3.94
Q1
2.12
Min
1.13

WAT’s P/B Ratio of 7.39 is in the upper tier for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GSK vs. WAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGSKWAT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.9434.06
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.217.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.977.39
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.1436.69