Seek Returns logo

GS vs. NVDA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GS and NVDA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGSNVDA
Company NameThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.NVIDIA Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization226.94 billion USD4,428.79 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 4, 1999January 22, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GS and NVDA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GS vs. NVDA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGSNVDA
5-Day Price Return4.71%3.78%
13-Week Price Return21.75%34.02%
26-Week Price Return19.83%35.09%
52-Week Price Return47.61%43.60%
Month-to-Date Return3.60%2.10%
Year-to-Date Return30.92%35.23%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.54M167.08M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.10M189.96M
3-Month Volatility21.41%26.38%
Beta1.442.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GS

12.67%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

GS’s Return on Equity of 12.67% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NVDA

106.92%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

NVDA’s Return on Equity of 106.92% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GS vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GS

12.29%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, GS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.29% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

NVDA

51.69%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

NVDA’s Net Profit Margin of 51.69% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

GS vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GS

15.68%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

GS’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.68% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

NVDA

58.03%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

An Operating Profit Margin of 58.03% places NVDA in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GS vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGSNVDA
Return on Equity (TTM)12.67%106.92%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.89%73.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.29%51.69%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.68%58.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.58%70.52%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GS

0.30

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

NVDA

3.39

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

NVDA’s Current Ratio of 3.39 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GS vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GS

9.08

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

NVDA

0.10

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

NVDA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.10 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GS vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GS

--

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

NVDA

75.66

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

NVDA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 75.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GS vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGSNVDA
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.303.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.302.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)9.080.10
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--75.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

GS vs. NVDA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GS vs. NVDA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GS

2.14%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

GS’s Dividend Yield of 2.14% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NVDA

0.02%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NVDA’s Dividend Yield of 0.02% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GS vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GS

29.94%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

GS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.94% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

NVDA

1.28%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NVDA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 1.28% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GS vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGSNVDA
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.14%0.02%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.94%1.28%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GS

13.98

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

GS’s P/E Ratio of 13.98 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NVDA

55.11

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

NVDA’s P/E Ratio of 55.11 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GS vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GS

1.72

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, GS’s P/S Ratio of 1.72 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

NVDA

28.49

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

With a P/S Ratio of 28.49, NVDA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GS vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GS

1.75

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

GS’s P/B Ratio of 1.75 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NVDA

31.64

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

At 31.64, NVDA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GS vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGSNVDA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.9855.11
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.7228.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.7531.64
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.2458.71