Seek Returns logo

GS vs. LLY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GS and LLY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGSLLY
Company NameThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.Eli Lilly and Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsHealth Care
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization218.16 billion USD632.40 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 4, 1999June 1, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GS and LLY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GS vs. LLY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGSLLY
5-Day Price Return-3.55%3.07%
13-Week Price Return17.70%-6.58%
26-Week Price Return11.05%-19.09%
52-Week Price Return42.80%-23.47%
Month-to-Date Return-0.40%-4.68%
Year-to-Date Return25.86%-8.62%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.61M9.65M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.19M4.51M
3-Month Volatility21.05%40.54%
Beta1.440.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GS

12.67%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

GS’s Return on Equity of 12.67% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LLY

88.36%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

LLY’s Return on Equity of 88.36% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GS vs. LLY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GS

12.29%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, GS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.29% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LLY

25.91%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

A Net Profit Margin of 25.91% places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GS vs. LLY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GS

15.68%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

GS’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.68% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LLY

32.37%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.37% places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GS vs. LLY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGSLLY
Return on Equity (TTM)12.67%88.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.89%16.02%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.29%25.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.68%32.37%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.58%82.64%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GS

0.30

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

LLY

1.28

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

LLY’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GS vs. LLY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GS

9.08

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

LLY

2.18

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

LLY’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Pharmaceuticals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.18. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GS vs. LLY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GS

--

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

LLY

20.36

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

LLY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GS vs. LLY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGSLLY
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.301.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.300.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)9.082.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--20.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

GS vs. LLY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GS vs. LLY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GS

2.14%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

GS’s Dividend Yield of 2.14% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LLY

0.77%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

LLY’s Dividend Yield of 0.77% is consistent with its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GS vs. LLY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GS

29.94%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

GS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.94% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

LLY

36.46%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

LLY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.46% is within the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GS vs. LLY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGSLLY
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.14%0.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.94%36.46%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GS

13.98

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

GS’s P/E Ratio of 13.98 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LLY

47.48

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

At 47.48, LLY’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GS vs. LLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GS

1.72

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, GS’s P/S Ratio of 1.72 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LLY

12.30

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 12.30, LLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Pharmaceuticals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GS vs. LLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GS

1.75

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

GS’s P/B Ratio of 1.75 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LLY

40.43

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

At 40.43, LLY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GS vs. LLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGSLLY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.9847.48
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.7212.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.7540.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.24326.03