Seek Returns logo

GS vs. KDP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GS and KDP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGSKDP
Company NameThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsBeverages
Market Capitalization218.16 billion USD47.73 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 4, 1999May 7, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GS and KDP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GS vs. KDP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGSKDP
5-Day Price Return-3.55%1.40%
13-Week Price Return17.70%4.60%
26-Week Price Return11.05%8.27%
52-Week Price Return42.80%-0.97%
Month-to-Date Return-0.40%7.61%
Year-to-Date Return25.86%9.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.61M6.95M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.19M10.93M
3-Month Volatility21.05%17.09%
Beta1.440.48

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GS

12.67%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

GS’s Return on Equity of 12.67% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KDP

6.23%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

KDP’s Return on Equity of 6.23% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GS vs. KDP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GS

12.29%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, GS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.29% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

KDP

9.75%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

KDP’s Net Profit Margin of 9.75% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GS vs. KDP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GS

15.68%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

GS’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.68% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

KDP

16.89%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

KDP’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.89% is around the midpoint for the Beverages industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GS vs. KDP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGSKDP
Return on Equity (TTM)12.67%6.23%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.89%2.87%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.29%9.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.68%16.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.58%54.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GS

0.30

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

KDP

0.64

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

KDP’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GS vs. KDP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GS

9.08

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

KDP

0.67

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

KDP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GS vs. KDP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GS

--

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

KDP

3.60

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

KDP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GS vs. KDP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGSKDP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.300.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.300.33
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)9.080.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--3.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

GS vs. KDP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GS vs. KDP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GS

2.14%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

GS’s Dividend Yield of 2.14% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KDP

2.56%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Yield of 2.56% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GS vs. KDP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GS

29.94%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

GS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.94% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KDP

54.58%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 54.58% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GS vs. KDP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGSKDP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.14%2.56%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.94%54.58%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GS

13.98

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

GS’s P/E Ratio of 13.98 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KDP

31.21

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

A P/E Ratio of 31.21 places KDP in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GS vs. KDP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GS

1.72

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, GS’s P/S Ratio of 1.72 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

KDP

3.04

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

KDP’s P/S Ratio of 3.04 is in the upper echelon for the Beverages industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GS vs. KDP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GS

1.75

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

GS’s P/B Ratio of 1.75 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KDP

1.80

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

KDP’s P/B Ratio of 1.80 is within the conventional range for the Beverages industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GS vs. KDP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGSKDP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.9831.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.723.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.751.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.2430.44