Seek Returns logo

GRMN vs. UMC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GRMN and UMC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GRMN is a standard domestic listing, while UMC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolGRMNUMC
Company NameGarmin Ltd.United Microelectronics Corporation
CountrySwitzerlandTaiwan
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryInformation Technology
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization44.30 billion USD17.33 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 8, 2000September 19, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GRMN and UMC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GRMN vs. UMC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGRMNUMC
5-Day Price Return-2.09%2.70%
13-Week Price Return12.32%-15.44%
26-Week Price Return9.48%1.21%
52-Week Price Return30.83%8.46%
Month-to-Date Return5.21%0.84%
Year-to-Date Return11.58%-2.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.68M42.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.86M44.80M
3-Month Volatility24.53%22.76%
Beta1.010.32

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GRMN

19.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Return on Equity of 19.82% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UMC

10.76%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

UMC’s Return on Equity of 10.76% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GRMN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GRMN

23.21%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

GRMN’s Net Profit Margin of 23.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UMC

16.69%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

UMC’s Net Profit Margin of 16.69% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GRMN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GRMN

26.02%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

GRMN’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

UMC

19.65%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

UMC’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.65% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRMN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGRMNUMC
Return on Equity (TTM)19.82%10.76%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.05%7.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.21%16.69%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.02%19.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)58.94%29.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

3.01

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

GRMN’s Current Ratio of 3.01 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UMC

1.77

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

UMC’s Current Ratio of 1.77 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GRMN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

0.00

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UMC

0.20

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

UMC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.20 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GRMN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

73.26

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

GRMN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 73.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UMC

313.16

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 313.16, UMC demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GRMN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGRMNUMC
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.011.77
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.881.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.20
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)73.26313.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

GRMN vs. UMC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GRMN vs. UMC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GRMN

1.36%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Yield of 1.36% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UMC

7.29%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UMC’s Dividend Yield of 7.29% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

GRMN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

38.63%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.63% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UMC

163.64%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 163.64% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

GRMN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGRMNUMC
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.36%7.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)38.63%163.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

28.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 28.32 places GRMN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UMC

13.00

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, UMC’s P/E Ratio of 13.00 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GRMN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

6.57

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 6.57, GRMN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UMC

2.17

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, UMC’s P/S Ratio of 2.17 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

GRMN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

4.95

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 4.95, GRMN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UMC

1.65

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

UMC’s P/B Ratio of 1.65 is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

GRMN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGRMNUMC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.3213.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.572.17
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.951.65
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)39.4214.05