Seek Returns logo

GRMN vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GRMN and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGRMNUBER
Company NameGarmin Ltd.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountrySwitzerlandUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization44.80 billion USD198.45 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 8, 2000May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GRMN and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GRMN vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGRMNUBER
5-Day Price Return-0.31%-0.17%
13-Week Price Return15.45%8.14%
26-Week Price Return-3.81%17.25%
52-Week Price Return31.00%29.80%
Month-to-Date Return6.38%8.44%
Year-to-Date Return12.83%57.76%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.62M15.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.85M20.51M
3-Month Volatility24.96%29.36%
Beta1.011.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GRMN

19.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Return on Equity of 19.82% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GRMN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GRMN

23.21%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

GRMN’s Net Profit Margin of 23.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GRMN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GRMN

26.02%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

GRMN’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRMN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGRMNUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)19.82%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.05%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.21%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.02%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)58.94%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

3.01

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

GRMN’s Current Ratio of 3.01 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GRMN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

0.00

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GRMN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

73.26

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

GRMN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 73.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GRMN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGRMNUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.011.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.880.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)73.26-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

GRMN vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GRMN vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GRMN

1.36%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Yield of 1.36% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GRMN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

38.63%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.63% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GRMN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGRMNUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.36%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)38.63%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

28.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 28.32 places GRMN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GRMN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

6.57

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 6.57, GRMN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GRMN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

4.95

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 4.95, GRMN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GRMN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGRMNUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.3215.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.574.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.958.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)39.4222.90