Seek Returns logo

GRMN vs. NTES: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GRMN and NTES, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GRMN is a standard domestic listing, while NTES trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolGRMNNTES
Company NameGarmin Ltd.NetEase, Inc.
CountrySwitzerlandChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryCommunication Services
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesEntertainment
Market Capitalization45.34 billion USD85.71 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 8, 2000June 30, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GRMN and NTES by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GRMN vs. NTES: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGRMNNTES
5-Day Price Return2.59%2.43%
13-Week Price Return14.61%8.67%
26-Week Price Return4.82%30.86%
52-Week Price Return31.19%63.74%
Month-to-Date Return7.67%3.66%
Year-to-Date Return14.19%51.41%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.67M0.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.85M1.00M
3-Month Volatility25.01%25.35%
Beta1.010.66

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GRMN

19.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Return on Equity of 19.82% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

NTES

24.25%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

In the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s Return on Equity of 24.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GRMN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GRMN

23.21%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

GRMN’s Net Profit Margin of 23.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

NTES

31.19%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.19% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GRMN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GRMN

26.02%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

GRMN’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

NTES

31.43%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.43% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GRMN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGRMNNTES
Return on Equity (TTM)19.82%24.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.05%17.31%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.21%31.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.02%31.43%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)58.94%63.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

3.01

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

GRMN’s Current Ratio of 3.01 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NTES

3.23

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

NTES’s Current Ratio of 3.23 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GRMN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

0.00

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

NTES

0.08

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

NTES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GRMN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

73.26

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

GRMN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 73.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NTES

161.13

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 161.13, NTES demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GRMN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGRMNNTES
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.013.23
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.883.10
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)73.26161.13

Growth

Revenue Growth

GRMN vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GRMN vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GRMN

1.36%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Yield of 1.36% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NTES

2.18%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.18%, NTES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Entertainment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GRMN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

38.63%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.63% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NTES

36.90%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.90% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GRMN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGRMNNTES
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.36%2.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)38.63%36.90%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

28.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 28.32 places GRMN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

NTES

16.94

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s P/E Ratio of 16.94 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GRMN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

6.57

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 6.57, GRMN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NTES

5.28

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

NTES’s P/S Ratio of 5.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GRMN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

4.95

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 4.95, GRMN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NTES

4.09

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

NTES’s P/B Ratio of 4.09 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GRMN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGRMNNTES
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.3216.94
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.575.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.954.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)39.4213.09