Seek Returns logo

GRMN vs. MSFT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GRMN and MSFT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGRMNMSFT
Company NameGarmin Ltd.Microsoft Corporation
CountrySwitzerlandUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryInformation Technology
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesSoftware
Market Capitalization50.00 billion USD3,901.30 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 8, 2000March 13, 1986
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GRMN and MSFT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GRMN vs. MSFT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGRMNMSFT
5-Day Price Return0.79%1.77%
13-Week Price Return19.65%4.24%
26-Week Price Return40.16%40.67%
52-Week Price Return59.24%28.16%
Month-to-Date Return5.50%1.33%
Year-to-Date Return25.94%24.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.72M17.77M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.85M19.84M
3-Month Volatility25.51%16.56%
Beta1.041.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GRMN

19.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Return on Equity of 19.82% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MSFT

32.44%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, MSFT’s Return on Equity of 32.44% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GRMN vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GRMN

23.21%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

GRMN’s Net Profit Margin of 23.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MSFT

36.15%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 36.15% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GRMN vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GRMN

26.02%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

GRMN’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

MSFT

45.29%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 45.29% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GRMN vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGRMNMSFT
Return on Equity (TTM)19.82%32.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.05%18.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.21%36.15%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.02%45.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)58.94%68.82%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

3.01

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

GRMN’s Current Ratio of 3.01 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MSFT

1.35

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

MSFT’s Current Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GRMN vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

0.00

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MSFT

0.26

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

MSFT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.26 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GRMN vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

73.26

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

GRMN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 73.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MSFT

891.80

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 891.80, MSFT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GRMN vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGRMNMSFT
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.011.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.881.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)73.26891.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

GRMN vs. MSFT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GRMN vs. MSFT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GRMN

1.22%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Yield of 1.22% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MSFT

0.62%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSFT’s Dividend Yield of 0.62% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

GRMN vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

38.63%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.63% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MSFT

23.65%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 23.65%, MSFT’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

GRMN vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGRMNMSFT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.22%0.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)38.63%23.65%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

31.66

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

A P/E Ratio of 31.66 places GRMN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MSFT

38.36

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

MSFT’s P/E Ratio of 38.36 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GRMN vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

7.35

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 7.35, GRMN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MSFT

13.87

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

MSFT’s P/S Ratio of 13.87 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GRMN vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

4.95

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

At 4.95, GRMN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MSFT

10.76

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

MSFT’s P/B Ratio of 10.76 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GRMN vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGRMNMSFT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.6638.36
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.3513.87
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.9510.76
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.0654.55