Seek Returns logo

GRMN vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GRMN and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGRMNJBL
Company NameGarmin Ltd.Jabil Inc.
CountrySwitzerlandUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryInformation Technology
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization45.34 billion USD22.31 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 8, 2000May 3, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GRMN and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GRMN vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGRMNJBL
5-Day Price Return2.59%1.39%
13-Week Price Return14.61%22.89%
26-Week Price Return4.82%27.85%
52-Week Price Return31.19%91.26%
Month-to-Date Return7.67%-6.84%
Year-to-Date Return14.19%44.48%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.67M1.45M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.85M1.36M
3-Month Volatility25.01%32.85%
Beta1.011.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GRMN

19.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Return on Equity of 19.82% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

JBL

38.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GRMN vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GRMN

23.21%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

GRMN’s Net Profit Margin of 23.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

JBL

2.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GRMN vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GRMN

26.02%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

GRMN’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

JBL

4.08%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

GRMN vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGRMNJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)19.82%38.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.05%3.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.21%2.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.02%4.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)58.94%8.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

3.01

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

GRMN’s Current Ratio of 3.01 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JBL

0.98

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GRMN vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

0.00

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

JBL

2.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GRMN vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

73.26

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

GRMN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 73.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JBL

11.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GRMN vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGRMNJBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.010.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.880.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.002.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)73.2611.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

GRMN vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GRMN vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GRMN

1.36%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Yield of 1.36% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

JBL

0.17%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GRMN vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

38.63%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.63% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

JBL

6.59%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GRMN vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGRMNJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.36%0.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)38.63%6.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

28.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 28.32 places GRMN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

JBL

37.97

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 37.97 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GRMN vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

6.57

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 6.57, GRMN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

JBL

0.77

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

GRMN vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

4.95

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 4.95, GRMN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

JBL

14.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 14.04, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GRMN vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGRMNJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.3237.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.570.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.9514.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)39.4218.82