Seek Returns logo

GRMN vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GRMN and IBM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGRMNIBM
Company NameGarmin Ltd.International Business Machines Corporation
CountrySwitzerlandUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryInformation Technology
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesIT Services
Market Capitalization44.30 billion USD225.94 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 8, 2000January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GRMN and IBM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GRMN vs. IBM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGRMNIBM
5-Day Price Return-2.09%2.29%
13-Week Price Return12.32%-9.63%
26-Week Price Return9.48%-6.42%
52-Week Price Return30.83%24.56%
Month-to-Date Return5.21%-4.19%
Year-to-Date Return11.58%10.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.68M5.60M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.86M4.60M
3-Month Volatility24.53%24.47%
Beta1.010.69

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GRMN

19.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Return on Equity of 19.82% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IBM

21.99%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.99% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GRMN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GRMN

23.21%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

GRMN’s Net Profit Margin of 23.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

IBM

9.11%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GRMN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GRMN

26.02%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

GRMN’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

IBM

9.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.77% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRMN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGRMNIBM
Return on Equity (TTM)19.82%21.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.05%4.12%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.21%9.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.02%9.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)58.94%57.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

3.01

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

GRMN’s Current Ratio of 3.01 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IBM

0.91

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.91 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GRMN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

0.00

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IBM

2.33

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.33. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GRMN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

73.26

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

GRMN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 73.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GRMN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGRMNIBM
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.010.91
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.880.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.002.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)73.2645.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

GRMN vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GRMN vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GRMN

1.36%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Yield of 1.36% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IBM

2.76%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.76%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GRMN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

38.63%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.63% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IBM

75.57%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 75.57% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

GRMN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGRMNIBM
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.36%2.76%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)38.63%75.57%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

28.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 28.32 places GRMN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

IBM

38.56

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

A P/E Ratio of 38.56 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GRMN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GRMN

6.57

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 6.57, GRMN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IBM

3.51

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 3.51 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GRMN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GRMN

4.95

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 4.95, GRMN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IBM

9.96

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.96 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GRMN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGRMNIBM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.3238.56
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.573.51
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.959.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)39.4219.13