Seek Returns logo

GRAB vs. UI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GRAB and UI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGRABUI
Company NameGrab Holdings LimitedUbiquiti Inc.
CountrySingaporeUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryGround TransportationCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization25.93 billion USD41.28 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateDecember 1, 2020October 14, 2011
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GRAB and UI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GRAB vs. UI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGRABUI
5-Day Price Return5.12%0.67%
13-Week Price Return27.45%69.31%
26-Week Price Return49.30%135.48%
52-Week Price Return72.36%204.85%
Month-to-Date Return5.65%3.30%
Year-to-Date Return34.75%105.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume47.13M0.18M
3-Month Avg. Volume43.35M0.15M
3-Month Volatility38.11%73.93%
Beta0.901.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GRAB

1.73%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

GRAB’s Return on Equity of 1.73% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

UI

179.90%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
20.90%
Median
9.10%
Q1
4.29%
Min
-13.50%

UI’s Return on Equity of 179.90% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GRAB vs. UI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

3.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

UI

27.66%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
12.56%
Median
5.62%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-3.09%

UI’s Net Profit Margin of 27.66% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

GRAB vs. UI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

-1.63%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

GRAB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.63%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

UI

32.50%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
25.23%
Q3
13.72%
Median
6.44%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-10.95%

UI’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.50% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

GRAB vs. UI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGRABUI
Return on Equity (TTM)1.73%179.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.13%55.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.61%27.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-1.63%32.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.87%43.42%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

1.88

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

GRAB’s Current Ratio of 1.88 is in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

UI

1.65

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
2.13
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.91

UI’s Current Ratio of 1.65 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GRAB vs. UI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

0.30

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UI

0.37

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.86
Median
0.53
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

UI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GRAB vs. UI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

-3.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

GRAB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.80. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

UI

27.30

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
7.59
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

UI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 27.30 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GRAB vs. UI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGRABUI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.881.65
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.820.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.300.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.8027.30

Growth

Revenue Growth

GRAB vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GRAB vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

GRAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UI

0.35%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
8.13%
Q3
3.29%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Yield of 0.35% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GRAB vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

GRAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UI

20.39%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
70.91%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.39% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GRAB vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGRABUI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%20.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

233.54

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

At 233.54, GRAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UI

58.05

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
103.74
Q3
61.65
Median
26.20
Q1
18.12
Min
4.19

UI’s P/E Ratio of 58.05 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GRAB vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

8.44

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 8.44, GRAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UI

16.06

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.86
Q3
6.24
Median
2.44
Q1
1.02
Min
0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 16.06, UI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GRAB vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

3.22

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

GRAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.22 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UI

37.26

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.28
Q3
5.73
Median
3.32
Q1
2.02
Min
0.42

At 37.26, UI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GRAB vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGRABUI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)233.5458.05
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.4416.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.2237.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)42.5765.86
GRAB vs. UI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison