GRAB vs. SONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 28, 2025

Here’s a clear look at GRAB and SONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GRAB is a standard domestic listing, while SONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	GRAB	SONY
Company Name	Grab Holdings Limited	Sony Group Corporation
Country	Singapore	Japan
GICS Sector	Industrials	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Ground Transportation	Household Durables
Market Capitalization	20.18 billion USD	166.84 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	December 1, 2020	February 21, 1973
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GRAB and SONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GRAB vs. SONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	GRAB	SONY
5-Day Price Return	-1.20%	-0.78%
13-Week Price Return	-0.40%	9.52%
26-Week Price Return	1.02%	6.20%
52-Week Price Return	52.78%	13.72%
Month-to-Date Return	1.23%	11.24%
Year-to-Date Return	4.87%	21.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume	22.89M	13.08M
3-Month Avg. Volume	34.63M	14.18M
3-Month Volatility	38.53%	30.82%
Beta	0.86	1.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GRAB

1.73%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 22.11%
Q3: 13.84%
Median: 9.66%
Q1: 7.55%
Min: 0.36%

GRAB’s Return on Equity of 1.73% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 26.99%
Q3: 17.28%
Median: 12.66%
Q1: 7.34%
Min: 0.07%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GRAB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

3.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 32.20%
Q3: 18.59%
Median: 7.11%
Q1: 4.13%
Min: -10.38%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 15.50%
Q3: 8.99%
Median: 6.57%
Q1: 4.33%
Min: -0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.13% places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GRAB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

-1.63%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 41.31%
Q3: 23.16%
Median: 11.33%
Q1: 6.82%
Min: -12.08%

GRAB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.63%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 20.22%
Q3: 12.29%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 6.30%
Min: -1.92%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRAB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	GRAB	SONY
Return on Equity (TTM)	1.73%	14.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.13%	3.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	3.61%	9.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	-1.63%	11.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	42.87%	31.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

1.88

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 2.03
Q3: 1.26
Median: 0.89
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.38

GRAB’s Current Ratio of 1.88 is in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max: 9.23
Q3: 4.50
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.29
Min: 0.70

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GRAB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

0.30

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 2.51
Q3: 1.51
Median: 1.06
Q1: 0.47
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.84
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.19
Min: 0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GRAB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

-3.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 51.07
Q3: 22.54
Median: 7.94
Q1: 2.72
Min: -24.57

GRAB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.80. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 77.14
Median: 24.53
Q1: 5.69
Min: -17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

GRAB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	GRAB	SONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.88	1.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.82	1.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.30	0.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	-3.80	104.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

GRAB vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GRAB vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 5.44%
Q3: 2.49%
Median: 1.53%
Q1: 0.39%
Min: 0.00%

GRAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SONY

0.47%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 8.95%
Q3: 4.19%
Median: 1.88%
Q1: 0.03%
Min: 0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GRAB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 137.07%
Q3: 74.71%
Median: 41.16%
Q1: 15.12%
Min: 0.00%

GRAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 125.12%
Q3: 62.43%
Median: 39.18%
Q1: 5.55%
Min: 0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GRAB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	GRAB	SONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	10.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

184.71

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 42.59
Q3: 24.86
Median: 16.38
Q1: 12.79
Min: 4.37

At 184.71, GRAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SONY

22.21

Household Durables Industry

Max: 29.75
Q3: 18.88
Median: 13.25
Q1: 9.26
Min: 6.32

A P/E Ratio of 22.21 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GRAB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

6.67

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 4.02
Q3: 2.20
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.87
Min: 0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 6.67, GRAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SONY

2.03

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.12
Q3: 1.21
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.51
Min: 0.18

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GRAB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

3.22

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 4.95
Q3: 2.78
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.17
Min: 0.64

GRAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.22 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.29
Median: 1.34
Q1: 0.98
Min: 0.59

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GRAB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	GRAB	SONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	184.71	22.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	6.67	2.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.22	2.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	33.67	12.66