Seek Returns logo

GRAB vs. QCOM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GRAB and QCOM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGRABQCOM
Company NameGrab Holdings LimitedQUALCOMM Incorporated
CountrySingaporeUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryGround TransportationSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization20.51 billion USD167.72 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 1, 2020December 13, 1991
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GRAB and QCOM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GRAB vs. QCOM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGRABQCOM
5-Day Price Return-1.95%-1.68%
13-Week Price Return-0.98%1.13%
26-Week Price Return1.41%-9.71%
52-Week Price Return51.05%-10.80%
Month-to-Date Return2.86%5.91%
Year-to-Date Return6.57%1.18%
10-Day Avg. Volume25.62M6.66M
3-Month Avg. Volume35.00M8.31M
3-Month Volatility39.13%27.46%
Beta0.861.24

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GRAB

1.73%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

GRAB’s Return on Equity of 1.73% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

QCOM

42.85%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, QCOM’s Return on Equity of 42.85% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GRAB vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

3.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

QCOM

26.77%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.77% places QCOM in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GRAB vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

-1.63%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

GRAB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.63%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

QCOM

27.54%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

QCOM’s Operating Profit Margin of 27.54% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRAB vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGRABQCOM
Return on Equity (TTM)1.73%42.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.13%20.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.61%26.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-1.63%27.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.87%55.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

1.88

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

GRAB’s Current Ratio of 1.88 is in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

QCOM

3.19

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

QCOM’s Current Ratio of 3.19 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GRAB vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

0.30

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

QCOM

0.54

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

QCOM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GRAB vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

-3.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

GRAB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.80. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

QCOM

38.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

QCOM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.40 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GRAB vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGRABQCOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.883.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.822.38
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.300.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.8038.40

Growth

Revenue Growth

GRAB vs. QCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GRAB vs. QCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

GRAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

QCOM

2.27%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.27%, QCOM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GRAB vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

GRAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

QCOM

32.79%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QCOM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.79% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GRAB vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGRABQCOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.27%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%32.79%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

184.71

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

At 184.71, GRAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

QCOM

14.43

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, QCOM’s P/E Ratio of 14.43 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GRAB vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

6.67

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 6.67, GRAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

QCOM

3.86

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

QCOM’s P/S Ratio of 3.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GRAB vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

3.22

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

GRAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.22 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

QCOM

6.35

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

QCOM’s P/B Ratio of 6.35 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GRAB vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGRABQCOM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)184.7114.43
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.673.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.226.35
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.6714.38