Seek Returns logo

GRAB vs. NOK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GRAB and NOK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GRAB is a standard domestic listing, while NOK trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolGRABNOK
Company NameGrab Holdings LimitedNokia Oyj
CountrySingaporeFinland
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryGround TransportationCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization20.91 billion USD23.35 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateDecember 1, 2020July 1, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GRAB and NOK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GRAB vs. NOK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGRABNOK
5-Day Price Return-0.79%2.59%
13-Week Price Return1.01%-21.98%
26-Week Price Return-6.18%-22.82%
52-Week Price Return56.56%-1.47%
Month-to-Date Return2.45%2.70%
Year-to-Date Return6.14%-13.79%
10-Day Avg. Volume23.85M7.16M
3-Month Avg. Volume34.63M9.35M
3-Month Volatility38.95%29.91%
Beta0.860.81

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GRAB

1.73%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

GRAB’s Return on Equity of 1.73% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

NOK

5.01%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

NOK’s Return on Equity of 5.01% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GRAB vs. NOK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

3.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

NOK

5.31%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

NOK’s Net Profit Margin of 5.31% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GRAB vs. NOK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

-1.63%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

GRAB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.63%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

NOK

6.21%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

NOK’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.21% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRAB vs. NOK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGRABNOK
Return on Equity (TTM)1.73%5.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.13%2.68%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.61%5.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-1.63%6.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.87%44.23%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

1.88

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

GRAB’s Current Ratio of 1.88 is in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

NOK

1.46

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

NOK’s Current Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GRAB vs. NOK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

0.30

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

NOK

0.21

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, NOK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GRAB vs. NOK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

-3.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

GRAB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.80. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NOK

34.19

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

NOK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.19 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GRAB vs. NOK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGRABNOK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.881.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.821.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.300.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.8034.19

Growth

Revenue Growth

GRAB vs. NOK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GRAB vs. NOK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

GRAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NOK

3.61%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.61%, NOK offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GRAB vs. NOK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

GRAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NOK

50.74%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NOK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.74% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GRAB vs. NOK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGRABNOK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%50.74%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

184.71

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

At 184.71, GRAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

NOK

19.25

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

NOK’s P/E Ratio of 19.25 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GRAB vs. NOK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

6.67

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 6.67, GRAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NOK

1.02

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

NOK’s P/S Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GRAB vs. NOK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

3.22

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

GRAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.22 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NOK

1.21

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

NOK’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is in the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

GRAB vs. NOK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGRABNOK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)184.7119.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.671.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.221.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.6713.27