Seek Returns logo

GRAB vs. MRVL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GRAB and MRVL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGRABMRVL
Company NameGrab Holdings LimitedMarvell Technology, Inc.
CountrySingaporeUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryGround TransportationSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization20.51 billion USD62.94 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 1, 2020June 30, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GRAB and MRVL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GRAB vs. MRVL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGRABMRVL
5-Day Price Return-1.95%-4.87%
13-Week Price Return-0.98%21.44%
26-Week Price Return1.41%-31.96%
52-Week Price Return51.05%2.33%
Month-to-Date Return2.86%-9.17%
Year-to-Date Return6.57%-33.91%
10-Day Avg. Volume25.62M13.38M
3-Month Avg. Volume35.00M18.94M
3-Month Volatility39.13%48.40%
Beta0.861.92

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GRAB

1.73%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

GRAB’s Return on Equity of 1.73% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MRVL

-3.62%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

MRVL has a negative Return on Equity of -3.62%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GRAB vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

3.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MRVL

-7.56%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

MRVL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7.56%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GRAB vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

-1.63%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

GRAB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.63%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MRVL

-4.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

MRVL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.57%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GRAB vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGRABMRVL
Return on Equity (TTM)1.73%-3.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.13%-2.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.61%-7.56%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-1.63%-4.57%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.87%43.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

1.88

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

GRAB’s Current Ratio of 1.88 is in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MRVL

1.30

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

MRVL’s Current Ratio of 1.30 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GRAB vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

0.30

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MRVL

0.32

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MRVL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GRAB vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

-3.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

GRAB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.80. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MRVL

-4.13

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

MRVL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.13. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GRAB vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGRABMRVL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.881.30
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.820.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.300.32
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.80-4.13

Growth

Revenue Growth

GRAB vs. MRVL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GRAB vs. MRVL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

GRAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MRVL

0.34%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL’s Dividend Yield of 0.34% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GRAB vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

GRAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MRVL

27.43%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.43% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GRAB vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGRABMRVL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.34%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%27.43%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

184.71

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

At 184.71, GRAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MRVL

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

P/E Ratio data for MRVL is currently unavailable.

GRAB vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

6.67

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 6.67, GRAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MRVL

9.44

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

MRVL’s P/S Ratio of 9.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GRAB vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

3.22

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

GRAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.22 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MRVL

4.02

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

MRVL’s P/B Ratio of 4.02 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GRAB vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGRABMRVL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)184.71--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.679.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.224.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.6744.82