Seek Returns logo

GRAB vs. LDOS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GRAB and LDOS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGRABLDOS
Company NameGrab Holdings LimitedLeidos Holdings, Inc.
CountrySingaporeUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryGround TransportationProfessional Services
Market Capitalization20.51 billion USD23.11 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateDecember 1, 2020October 17, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GRAB and LDOS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GRAB vs. LDOS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGRABLDOS
5-Day Price Return-1.95%0.96%
13-Week Price Return-0.98%12.93%
26-Week Price Return1.41%37.90%
52-Week Price Return51.05%19.99%
Month-to-Date Return2.86%12.85%
Year-to-Date Return6.57%25.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume25.62M0.84M
3-Month Avg. Volume35.00M1.14M
3-Month Volatility39.13%24.66%
Beta0.860.71

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GRAB

1.73%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

GRAB’s Return on Equity of 1.73% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

LDOS

31.25%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

In the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, LDOS’s Return on Equity of 31.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GRAB vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

3.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LDOS

8.22%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

LDOS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.22% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GRAB vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

-1.63%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

GRAB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.63%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

LDOS

11.95%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

LDOS’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.95% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRAB vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGRABLDOS
Return on Equity (TTM)1.73%31.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.13%10.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.61%8.22%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-1.63%11.95%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.87%17.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

1.88

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

GRAB’s Current Ratio of 1.88 is in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LDOS

1.62

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

LDOS’s Current Ratio of 1.62 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GRAB vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

0.30

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LDOS

1.09

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

LDOS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.09 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GRAB vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

-3.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

GRAB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.80. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LDOS

11.64

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

LDOS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GRAB vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGRABLDOS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.881.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.821.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.301.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.8011.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

GRAB vs. LDOS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GRAB vs. LDOS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

GRAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LDOS

0.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Yield of 0.91% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GRAB vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

GRAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LDOS

14.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.91% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

GRAB vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGRABLDOS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%14.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

184.71

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

At 184.71, GRAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LDOS

16.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, LDOS’s P/E Ratio of 16.43 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GRAB vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

6.67

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 6.67, GRAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LDOS

1.35

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

LDOS’s P/S Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GRAB vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

3.22

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

GRAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.22 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LDOS

4.54

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

LDOS’s P/B Ratio of 4.54 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GRAB vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGRABLDOS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)184.7116.43
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.671.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.224.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.6717.20