Seek Returns logo

GRAB vs. KC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GRAB and KC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GRAB is a standard domestic listing, while KC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolGRABKC
Company NameGrab Holdings LimitedKingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited
CountrySingaporeChina
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryGround TransportationIT Services
Market Capitalization20.87 billion USD4.00 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 1, 2020May 8, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GRAB and KC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GRAB vs. KC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGRABKC
5-Day Price Return3.43%4.07%
13-Week Price Return2.61%-1.78%
26-Week Price Return9.64%-20.46%
52-Week Price Return57.06%445.45%
Month-to-Date Return4.70%-4.70%
Year-to-Date Return8.47%31.55%
10-Day Avg. Volume35.19M1.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume37.98M2.29M
3-Month Volatility40.83%74.25%
Beta0.862.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GRAB

1.73%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

GRAB’s Return on Equity of 1.73% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

KC

-35.31%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

KC has a negative Return on Equity of -35.31%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GRAB vs. KC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

3.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

KC

-24.08%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

KC has a negative Net Profit Margin of -24.08%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GRAB vs. KC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

-1.63%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

GRAB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.63%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

KC

-21.29%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

KC has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -21.29%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GRAB vs. KC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGRABKC
Return on Equity (TTM)1.73%-35.31%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.13%-10.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.61%-24.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-1.63%-21.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.87%17.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

1.88

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

GRAB’s Current Ratio of 1.88 is in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

KC

0.73

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

KC’s Current Ratio of 0.73 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GRAB vs. KC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

0.30

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

KC

1.01

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

KC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GRAB vs. KC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

-3.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

GRAB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.80. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

KC

-7.42

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

KC has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -7.42. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GRAB vs. KC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGRABKC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.880.73
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.820.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.301.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.80-7.42

Growth

Revenue Growth

GRAB vs. KC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GRAB vs. KC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

GRAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KC

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KC currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GRAB vs. KC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

GRAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KC

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KC has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GRAB vs. KC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGRABKC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

188.01

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

At 188.01, GRAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

KC

--

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

P/E Ratio data for KC is currently unavailable.

GRAB vs. KC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

6.79

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 6.79, GRAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

KC

3.67

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

KC’s P/S Ratio of 3.67 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GRAB vs. KC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

3.22

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

GRAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.22 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KC

5.22

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

KC’s P/B Ratio of 5.22 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GRAB vs. KC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGRABKC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)188.01--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.793.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.225.22
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)34.2777.06