Seek Returns logo

GRAB vs. IONQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GRAB and IONQ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGRABIONQ
Company NameGrab Holdings LimitedIonQ, Inc.
CountrySingaporeUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryGround TransportationTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization20.51 billion USD10.92 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateDecember 1, 2020January 4, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GRAB and IONQ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GRAB vs. IONQ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGRABIONQ
5-Day Price Return-1.95%-10.33%
13-Week Price Return-0.98%4.84%
26-Week Price Return1.41%-4.81%
52-Week Price Return51.05%404.66%
Month-to-Date Return2.86%-7.73%
Year-to-Date Return6.57%-11.92%
10-Day Avg. Volume25.62M19.59M
3-Month Avg. Volume35.00M21.16M
3-Month Volatility39.13%98.91%
Beta0.862.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GRAB

1.73%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

GRAB’s Return on Equity of 1.73% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

IONQ

-67.52%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

IONQ has a negative Return on Equity of -67.52%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GRAB vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

3.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

IONQ

-885.21%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

IONQ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -885.21%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GRAB vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GRAB

-1.63%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

GRAB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.63%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

IONQ

-700.61%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

IONQ has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -700.61%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GRAB vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGRABIONQ
Return on Equity (TTM)1.73%-67.52%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.13%-57.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.61%-885.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-1.63%-700.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.87%54.54%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

1.88

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

GRAB’s Current Ratio of 1.88 is in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

IONQ

7.76

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

IONQ’s Current Ratio of 7.76 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GRAB vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

0.30

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IONQ

0.00

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, IONQ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GRAB vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

-3.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

GRAB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.80. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

IONQ

-23.93

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

IONQ has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.93. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GRAB vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGRABIONQ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.887.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.827.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.300.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.80-23.93

Growth

Revenue Growth

GRAB vs. IONQ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GRAB vs. IONQ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

GRAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GRAB vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

GRAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GRAB vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGRABIONQ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

184.71

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

At 184.71, GRAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

IONQ

--

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

P/E Ratio data for IONQ is currently unavailable.

GRAB vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GRAB

6.67

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 6.67, GRAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IONQ

208.53

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 208.53, IONQ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GRAB vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GRAB

3.22

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

GRAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.22 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IONQ

9.68

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

IONQ’s P/B Ratio of 9.68 is in the upper tier for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GRAB vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGRABIONQ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)184.71--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.67208.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.229.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.67--