Seek Returns logo

GPN vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GPN and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GPN is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolGPNPAC
Company NameGlobal Payments Inc.Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
CountryUnited StatesMexico
GICS SectorFinancialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesTransportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization21.31 billion USD12.28 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 16, 2001February 27, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GPN and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GPN vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGPNPAC
5-Day Price Return2.47%-4.05%
13-Week Price Return15.96%1.58%
26-Week Price Return-14.87%8.22%
52-Week Price Return-20.43%44.78%
Month-to-Date Return9.87%4.02%
Year-to-Date Return-21.61%22.99%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.21M0.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.00M0.69M
3-Month Volatility37.18%21.02%
Beta1.011.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GPN

6.36%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

GPN’s Return on Equity of 6.36% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
26.85%
Q3
15.47%
Median
10.39%
Q1
7.70%
Min
0.79%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GPN vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GPN

15.07%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

GPN’s Net Profit Margin of 15.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
49.26%
Q3
27.75%
Median
17.98%
Q1
10.18%
Min
4.19%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GPN vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GPN

23.26%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

GPN’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.26% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
60.91%
Q3
43.57%
Median
30.58%
Q1
16.77%
Min
1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GPN vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGPNPAC
Return on Equity (TTM)6.36%42.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.96%11.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.07%23.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.26%42.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.01%100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GPN

0.95

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
1.90
Median
1.35
Q1
0.86
Min
0.28

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GPN vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GPN

0.74

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.70
Q3
1.70
Median
0.83
Q1
0.30
Min
0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GPN vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GPN

5.15

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
29.26
Q3
20.33
Median
8.92
Q1
5.22
Min
2.01

In the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GPN vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGPNPAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.950.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.900.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.742.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.155.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

GPN vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GPN vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GPN

1.18%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Yield of 1.18% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAC

2.53%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
7.48%
Q3
3.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.13%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GPN vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GPN

17.30%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.30% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
197.82%
Q3
109.11%
Median
70.69%
Q1
33.40%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GPN vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGPNPAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.18%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)17.30%71.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GPN

14.61

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

GPN’s P/E Ratio of 14.61 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAC

19.76

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
35.90
Q3
21.76
Median
17.41
Q1
12.31
Min
5.46

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.76 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GPN vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GPN

2.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

PAC

4.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
10.76
Q3
5.52
Median
2.96
Q1
1.59
Min
0.84

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GPN vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GPN

0.86

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

GPN’s P/B Ratio of 0.86 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.46
Q3
2.80
Median
1.80
Q1
1.12
Min
0.37

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GPN vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGPNPAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.6119.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.204.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.869.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.6918.23