Seek Returns logo

GPN vs. MTZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GPN and MTZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGPNMTZ
Company NameGlobal Payments Inc.MasTec, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization21.55 billion USD13.98 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 16, 2001February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GPN and MTZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GPN vs. MTZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGPNMTZ
5-Day Price Return2.54%1.07%
13-Week Price Return17.30%17.48%
26-Week Price Return-16.65%30.97%
52-Week Price Return-18.69%61.87%
Month-to-Date Return11.09%-6.38%
Year-to-Date Return-20.74%30.11%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.40M0.86M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.19M0.90M
3-Month Volatility37.42%28.65%
Beta1.001.83

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GPN

6.36%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

GPN’s Return on Equity of 6.36% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MTZ

9.20%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 9.20% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GPN vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GPN

15.07%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

GPN’s Net Profit Margin of 15.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MTZ

2.04%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.04% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GPN vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GPN

23.26%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

GPN’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.26% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MTZ

3.86%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.86% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GPN vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGPNMTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)6.36%9.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.96%2.97%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.07%2.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.26%3.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.01%12.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GPN

0.95

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MTZ

1.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GPN vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GPN

0.74

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

MTZ

0.77

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GPN vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GPN

5.15

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

MTZ

2.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GPN vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGPNMTZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.951.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.901.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.740.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.152.54

Growth

Revenue Growth

GPN vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GPN vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GPN

1.18%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Yield of 1.18% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GPN vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GPN

17.30%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.30% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GPN vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGPNMTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.18%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)17.30%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GPN

14.61

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

GPN’s P/E Ratio of 14.61 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MTZ

51.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 51.22, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GPN vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GPN

2.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

MTZ

1.04

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GPN vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GPN

0.86

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

GPN’s P/B Ratio of 0.86 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MTZ

4.56

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GPN vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGPNMTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.6151.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.201.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.864.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.6914.77